Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus
Date	2016-03-23 09:00 +0100
Message-ID	<rfLRV-g1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rfyrE-7UW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfCYh-2xh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfDhE-2E4-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfF9M-3SF-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > > Well, what about intel_idle_freeze()?  Or do we not care?
> > 
> > I argued against it; when you're suspended the NMI watchdog is stopped
> > too.
> 
> Is it also stopped for suspend-to-idle?  I'm not sure about that.
> 
> Where do I need to look to find out?

Hmm I have memories of writing a patch to that effect when we were
starting with that suspend-to-idle stuff, because people didn't like
being woken up all the time.

But now that I look I cannot find it either..

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-22 23:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle  cpus Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-23 01:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle  cpus Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-03-23 09:00 +0100

csiph-web