Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #1746
| From | Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops, comp.laptops, aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped |
| Date | 2013-01-17 11:19 +0400 |
| Organization | MLM Trap |
| Message-ID | <rf9ff8h6o7v3l2ell30ktav06t0n1i0fuf@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <eePHs.2459$1k5.439@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com> <2t1bf8plus4nq7eo965687sekid5736k3h@4ax.com> <04ccf8t6169d6bahfplao86gi0jd18rkpn@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:59:17 +1100, Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:01:40 +0400, Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> wrote:
>
>>Hi, I read you descrption and I read the answers. I admit that I do
>>frown about some answers.
>>
>>Okay, so I will give it a try.
>>
>>Key problem might be the HDD. It has several areas. One area is for the
>>data. But one totally different area is for booting, where the MBR is.
>>Some HDDs are reported fine, but the MBR space can not be correctly
>>written to. These HDDs one can only use for data, but one cannot boot
>>from them. From time to time such HDDs are sold at eBay's. So one has to
>>watch out NOT to buy such one if one wants to USE the computer with that
>>HDD, booting from it.
>>
>>During installation the Win XP wrote onto HDD. So writing in the data
>>area of the HDD seems to work.
>>
>>A strange problem might be HOW the HDD is access ("LBA") or other stuff.
>>I you prepared the HDD in an other computer, THAT VERY SETTING of the
>>OTHER computer is used for addressing on HDD. Might be that there are
>>differences in the parameters of both BIOSes. You ought to check them.
>>
>>About some MBR write-to preventions I have no clue. If a BIOS would have
>>such a parameter, I would not enable it. Also, the question is how the
>>installer of Win XP would react to such a write-barrier.
>>
>>That some Thinkpads would REQUIRE the HDD to be prepared on THAT VERY
>>THINKPAD where the HDD then is to be used I consider wrong. I guess that
>>in those cases some addressing was not done correctly.
>>
>>An easy mistake to make is to install the OS completely correct, but
>>spoil addressing of drive 1 and drive 2. You ought to check the jumpers
>>on the HDD and look at time of boot into the BIOS and see how the HDD is
>>recognized, as drive 1 or drive 2 - or simple "have none".
>>
>>
>>One test to make is to prepare the HDD on an other computer AND THERE
>>install Win XP and see if it boots there.
>>
>>One more test, quite simple and easy: install an other OS. Check it THAT
>>is able to boot on the HDD.
>>
>>Win XP is rather stupid. Before installing it, the partitioning should
>>be done correctly and the "active" partition for booting must have the
>>marker set in the partition table.
>>
>>One more pothole is how the boot actually is done. You ought to check
>>the sequence for booting. Might be that the boot gets stuck by accessing
>>some other device? The XP installs I had were prone for messing up with
>>a) partitioning and b) sequence of devices.
>>
>>
>>So, you have some days of work ahead... ;O)
>
>Really when one needs a new Windows computer one needs a new computer
No.
--
http://www.twitter.com/aribertdeckers http://www.Journalist.is
http://www.kindersprechstunde.at http://www.pharmamafia.com
http://www.medulla.at http://www.ariplex.com/folia
http://www.ariplex.com/pixaloid http://www.ariplex.com/lyme/lymeblog
Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "S Campbell" <campbellfam@no.spam> - 2013-01-11 17:32 +1000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2013-01-11 00:47 -0800
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 20:18 +1100
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Tom Cole <tacoleNOSPAM@yahoo.co.nz.invalid> - 2013-01-12 11:33 +1300
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "Damian" <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> - 2013-01-13 12:30 +1100
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Parko <there.is.an.elephant@the.pantry.door.invalid> - 2013-01-15 22:55 +0000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> - 2013-01-15 21:01 +0400
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2013-01-16 15:59 +1100
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> - 2013-01-17 11:19 +0400
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 12:25 +1100
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "Bob Milutinovic" <cognicom@gmail.com> - 2013-01-16 19:20 +1100
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> - 2013-01-17 11:18 +0400
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "Bob Milutinovic" <cognicom@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 12:37 +1100
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "S Campbell" <campbellfam@no.spam> - 2013-02-05 19:49 +1000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> - 2013-02-06 09:33 +0400
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> - 2013-02-06 10:39 +0400
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped dg1261 <dgREMOVE-THIS1261@cs.com> - 2013-02-07 01:56 +0000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "S Campbell" <campbellfam@no.spam> - 2013-02-08 10:29 +1000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped dg1261 <dgREMOVE-THIS1261@cs.com> - 2013-02-08 04:07 +0000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped "S Campbell" <campbellfam@no.spam> - 2013-02-08 10:30 +1000
Re: IBM Thinkpad R30 - stumped Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 19:15 -0800
csiph-web