Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29719
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Page sizes |
| Date | 2020-06-27 17:21 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <rd7o64$u1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <rd6iuc$fkg$1@dont-email.me> <rd6p6t$krl$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> <rd6sm4$tra$1@dont-email.me> |
On 27/06/2020 09:32, Don Y wrote: > On 6/26/2020 11:33 PM, Bernd Linsel wrote: >> On 27.06.2020 06:45, Don Y wrote: >>> Are there any processors/PMMUs for which the following would be true >>> (nonzero)? >>> >>> (pagesize - 1) & pagesize >> >> That would imply that the page size is not an integral power of 2. > > Yes, that was the point of the question. If that was the point, why didn't you write that? Writing a C expression like that is appropriate if you are writing C code, but it would make more sense to write what you mean - and /why/ you are asking. > >> Very unlikely. > > As, for my needs, this is one of those "fundamental assumptions", I'm > looking for more assurance than "very unlikely" -- just as one wouldn't > pick one SPECIFIC page size and assume it to be ubiquitous (or even > expecting a single page size to be supported at any given instant) :> You might conceivably get an answer "this cpu has non-power-of-two page sizes". But you'll never get anything better than "very unlikely" the other way. You can't expect anyone (or even a combination of people) in this newsgroup to have used /every/ cpu design ever made, or that ever will be made. If you say why you think page sizes are relevant, however, then it's conceivable that people could give you more useful answers. > > But, I don't see any VALUE in other sizes as it needlessly complicates > any *hardware* implementation (though poses little barrier to a software > implementation!)
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-26 21:45 -0700
Re: Page sizes Bernd Linsel <bl1@gmx.com> - 2020-06-27 08:33 +0200
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-27 00:32 -0700
Re: Page sizes Bernd Linsel <bl1@gmx.com> - 2020-06-27 12:21 +0200
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-27 15:12 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-27 18:14 -0400
Re: Page sizes David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-06-27 17:21 +0200
Re: Page sizes Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-06-28 15:30 +1000
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-27 18:02 -0400
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-27 11:11 +0300
Re: Page sizes John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2020-06-27 07:59 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-27 17:37 -0400
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-27 15:10 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-27 18:35 -0400
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-27 16:36 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-28 01:01 -0400
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-27 23:50 -0700
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-28 13:27 +0300
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-28 11:49 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-30 00:05 -0400
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-29 23:24 -0700
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-30 11:00 +0300
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-30 12:23 -0700
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-07-01 13:31 +0300
Re: Page sizes Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-07-01 19:44 +0300
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-30 05:45 -0400
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-30 04:13 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-06-30 12:49 -0400
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-30 12:44 -0700
Re: Page sizes George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-07-02 03:14 -0400
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-28 09:24 +0300
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-28 00:11 -0700
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-28 15:59 +0300
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-28 12:04 -0700
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-30 06:43 +0300
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-29 23:47 -0700
Re: Page sizes Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-06-28 01:18 -0700
Re: Page sizes upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-06-28 16:29 +0300
Re: Page sizes Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-06-28 12:18 -0700
Re: Page sizes Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-06-27 18:27 -0400
Re: Page sizes Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.org> - 2020-07-04 06:11 +0000
csiph-web