Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1449229

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree

From Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree
Date 2016-07-25 02:40 +0200
Message-ID <rYC65-69G-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rYBWp-66u-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:24:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/overlayfs/super.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   e2475b7276d0 ("ovl: check mounter creds on underlying lookup")
> 
> from the overlayfs tree and commit:
> 
>   b3ac9a85b31c ("qstr: constify instances in overlayfs")
> 
> from the vfs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

FWIW, if Miklos could pick that one-liner into overlayfs tree, I'd be only
happy to drop it from that queue.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-25 02:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-07-25 02:40 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the overlayfs tree Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-07-25 10:10 +0200

csiph-web