Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1448763

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings

From Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings
Date 2016-07-22 22:40 +0200
Message-ID <rXPoK-2cw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rWJY5-fG-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXLXQ-8gM-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jul 22 2016 at 05:51:07 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:36:49PM -0700, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> The following patch to the ARM SMMU driver:
>> 
>>     commit d346180e70b91b3d5a1ae7e5603e65593d4622bc
>>     Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>     Date:   Tue Jan 26 18:06:34 2016 +0000
>>     
>>         iommu/arm-smmu: Treat all device transactions as unprivileged
>> 
>> started forcing all SMMU transactions to come through as "unprivileged".
>> The rationale given was that:
>> 
>>   (1) There is no way in the IOMMU API to even request privileged mappings.
>> 
>>   (2) It's difficult to implement a DMA mapper that correctly models the
>>       ARM VMSAv8 behavior of unprivileged-writeable =>
>>       privileged-execute-never.
>> 
>> This series rectifies (1) by introducing an IOMMU API for privileged
>> mappings and implements it in io-pgtable-arm.
>> 
>> This series rectifies (2) by introducing a new dma attribute
>> (DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED) for users of the DMA API that need privileged
>> mappings which are inaccessible to lesser-privileged execution levels, and
>> implements it in the arm64 IOMMU DMA mapper.  The one known user (pl330.c)
>> is converted over to the new attribute.
>> 
>> Jordan and Jeremy can provide more info on the use case if needed, but the
>> high level is that it's a security feature to prevent attacks such as [1].
>
> This all looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> It looks pretty fiddly to merge, however. How are you planning to get
> this upstream?

Fiddly in what way?  Do you mean in relation to "dma-mapping: Use
unsigned long for dma_attrs" [1]?  I admit I wasn't aware of that
activity until Robin mentioned it.  It looks like it's merged on
next/master, shall I rebase/rework on that and resend?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/13/198


-Mitch

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-19 22:40 +0200
  [PATCH v3 3/6] common: DMA-mapping: add DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED attribute Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-19 22:40 +0200
  [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu: add IOMMU_PRIV attribute Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-19 22:40 +0200
  [PATCH v3 2/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for the IOMMU_PRIV flag Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-19 22:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-07-22 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-22 22:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-07-25 12:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-25 21:10 +0200

csiph-web