Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1447018
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake |
| Date | 2016-07-20 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rWTup-6ma-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rWLZU-1uE-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWLZU-1uE-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Andy Gross wrote: > So not too long ago there were irq extensions that you could add in to an > irq controller that would allow for intercepting the set wake calls. This > went away and was replaced by the hierarchical irq design. For a very good reason. The 'extensions' were a horrible hack and an unmaintainable mess. This problem is not that hard to solve w/o these hacks. Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-07-20 00:50 +0200
Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-07-20 08:50 +0200
Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-07-20 10:20 +0200
Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> - 2016-07-20 15:20 +0200
Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-07-20 15:30 +0200
Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-07-20 15:40 +0200
csiph-web