Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442377
| From | Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] virtio: Return correct errno for function init_vq's failure |
| Date | 2016-07-13 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUr9f-2Tk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rOu9P-2qF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRR9U-7jD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUqZA-2Ax-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 |
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:54:00 +0800 Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/06/16 at 11:18P, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:09:18 +0800 > > Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The error number -ENOENT or 0 will be returned, if we can not allocate > > > more memory in function init_vq. If host can support multiple virtual > > > queues, and we fails to allocate necessary memory structures for vq, > > > kernel may crash due to incorrect returning. > > > > > > To fix it, kernel will return correct value in init_vq. > > The error handling in this function looks horrible. > > > > When mq was introduced, init_vq started mixing up several things: > > - The mq feature is not available - which is not an error, and > > therefore should not have any influence on the return code. > > - One of the several memory allocations failed - only ->vqs gets > > special treatment, however. > > - The ->find_vqs callback failed. > > Yep. And without this patch, it is silent for boot failure. I think it > makes sense to let user notify about this failure. Agreed. > > > > > Your patch fixes the code, but it is still very convoluted due to the > > temporary arrays. > > > > May it be worthwile to introduce a helper for setting up the virtqueues > > where all virtqueues are essentially the same and just get a > > consecutive number? Michael? > > > > Hmm, How about refactor this function to make it more readable, since we > do a lot of work in it. > > I will post an update to refactor this function. Anything to make this more readable probably helps :)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] virtio: Return correct errno for function init_vq's failure Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 14:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH] virtio: Return correct errno for function init_vq's failure Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-13 14:10 +0200
csiph-web