Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1443468
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: use pte_none() to test for empty PTE |
| Date | 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUPbB-1TY-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rSrGp-5Fj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSrQ5-5JH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 07/08/2016 02:19 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>
> The page table manipulation code seems to have grown a couple of
> sites that are looking for empty PTEs. Just in case one of these
> entries got a stray bit set, use pte_none() instead of checking
> for a zero pte_val().
>
> The use pte_same() makes me a bit nervous. If we were doing a
> pte_same() check against two cleared entries and one of them had
> a stray bit set, it might fail the pte_same() check. But, I
> don't think we ever _do_ pte_same() for cleared entries. It is
> almost entirely used for checking for races in fault-in paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
So, this might be just because I know next to nothing about (para)virt,
but...
in arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h, pte_val is implemented via some
pvops, which suggests that obtaining a pte value is different than just
reading it from memory. But I don't see pte_none() defined to be using
this on paravirt, and it shares (before patch 2/4) the "return !pte.pte"
implementation, AFAICS?
So that itself is suspicious to me. And now that this patches does
things like this:
- if (pte_val(*pte)) {
+ if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
So previously on paravirt these tests would read pte via the pvops, and
now they won't. Is that OK?
Thanks,
Vlastimil
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: use pte_none() to test for empty PTE Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: use pte_none() to test for empty PTE Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2016-07-14 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: use pte_none() to test for empty PTE David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-07-14 17:00 +0200
csiph-web