Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1443049
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface |
| Date | 2016-07-14 05:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUFFf-43M-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r2YMV-7mJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2YMW-7mJ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUC4F-1yk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:47 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:06 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: >> This patch provides a proc/PID/timerslack_ns interface which >> exposes a task's timerslack value in nanoseconds and allows it >> to be changed. >> >> This allows power/performance management software to set timer >> slack for other threads according to its policy for the thread >> (such as when the thread is designated foreground vs. background >> activity) >> >> If the value written is non-zero, slack is set to that value. >> Otherwise sets it to the default for the thread. >> >> This interface checks that the calling task has permissions to >> to use PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS on the target task, so that we >> can ensure arbitrary apps do not change the timer slack for other >> apps. > > Sigh. > > So I wanted to pull this thread up again, because when I originally > proposed upstreaming the PR_SET_TIMERSLACK_PID feature from the AOSP > common.git tree, the first objection from Arjan was that it only > required CAP_SYS_NICE: > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.3/01491.html > > And reasonably, setting timerslack to very large values does have the > potential to effect applications much further then what a task could > do previously with CAP_SYS_NICE. > > CAP_SYS_PTRACE was suggested instead, as that allows applications to > manipulate other tasks more drastically. > > (At the time, I checked with some of the Android developers, and got > no objection to changing to use this capability.) > > However, after submitting the changes to Android required to support > the upstreamed /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns interface, I've gotten some > objections with adding CAP_SYS_PTRACE to the system_server, as this > would allow the system_server to be able to inspect and modify memory > on any task in the system. This gives the system_server privileged to > effect applications much further then what it could do previously. > > So I worry I'm a bit stuck here. For general systems, CAP_SYS_NICE is > too low a level of privilege to set a tasks timerslack, but > apparently CAP_SYS_PTRACE is too high a privilege for Android's > system_server to require just to set a tasks timerslack value. > > So I wanted to ask again if we might consider backing this down to > CAP_SYS_NICE, or if we can instead introduce a new CAP_SYS_TIMERSLACK > or something to provide the needed in-between capability level. Adding new capabilities appears to not really be viable (lots of threads about this...) I think the original CAP_SYS_NICE should be fine. A malicious CAP_SYS_NICE process can do plenty of insane things, I don't feel like the timer slack adds to any realistic risks. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-14 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-07-14 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-07-14 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-14 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-14 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-07-14 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-07-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-07-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-14 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-07-14 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-14 22:30 +0200
csiph-web