Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1439802
| From | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Input: alps - cleanup |
| Date | 2016-07-08 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rSLF7-1Z3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rH0Tf-4eU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMicN-72i-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMs2u-5aD-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSfYB-6lM-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:41:01PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 21 June 2016 13:27:30 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 20 June 2016 17:31:13 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Hi Pali, > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 01:23:56PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > This patch series cleanup usage of alps_model_data table. > > > > > > > > Pali Rohár (5): > > > > Input: alps - move ALPS_PROTO_V6 out of alps_model_data table > > > > Input: alps - move ALPS_PROTO_V4 out of alps_model_data table > > > > Input: alps - move ALPS_PROTO_V1 out of alps_model_data table > > > > Input: alps - warn about unsupported ALPS V9 touchpad > > > > Input: alps - cleanup ALPS_PROTO_V2 detection > > > > > > Frankly, I do not quite like this series. The rule of thumb we had: if > > > we can use e7 data to identify the device it should go into table, > > > if we need to have more elaborate logic - then implement it in > > > __alps_indentify(). I would understand if we got rid of the table > > > completely, but we didn't. > > > > Hans and me agreed that alps_model_data array is for old touchpads > > defined as quirks table. So in this patch series I'm trying to eliminate > > using that array. And it is possible for V1, V4 and V6 touchpads because > > each protocol has only one entry in table. And last user is just V2 > > protocol which is I think better... > > > > So this is my motivation for this patch series. > > Any suggestion how to rework it? And any agreement if we should remove > V1/V4/V6 from alps_model_date or let it stay here? As I mentioned below I am happy with removing ALPS_PROTO_V4 and subsequently command_mode_resp from alps_model_info, while leaving the rest in the table. Thanks. > > > > I think the patch removing ALPS_PROTO_V4 and subsequent patch removing > > > command_mode_resp from alps_model_info are good, the rest are not so > > > much. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > -- > Pali Rohár > pali.rohar@gmail.com -- Dmitry
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Input: alps - cleanup Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Input: alps - cleanup Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Input: alps - cleanup Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> - 2016-07-09 12:00 +0200
csiph-web