Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1439547

Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Avoid sending an IPI to a CPU already doing a push

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Avoid sending an IPI to a CPU already doing a push
Date 2016-07-08 17:00 +0200
Message-ID <rSFq2-68d-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rNBdo-1jE-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:26:13AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The IPI code now needs to call push_tasks() instead of just push_task() as
> it will not be receiving an IPI for each CPU that is requesting a PULL.

My brain just skidded on that, can you try again with a few more words?


> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index d5690b722691..165bcfdbd94b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>  	rt_rq->push_flags = 0;
>  	rt_rq->push_cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&rt_rq->push_lock);
> +	atomic_set(&rt_rq->ipi_count, 0);
>  	init_irq_work(&rt_rq->push_work, push_irq_work_func);
>  #endif
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> @@ -1917,6 +1918,10 @@ static int find_next_push_cpu(struct rq *rq)
>  			break;
>  		next_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>  
> +		/* If pushing was already started, ignore */
> +		if (atomic_read(&next_rq->rt.ipi_count))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		/* Make sure the next rq can push to this rq */
>  		if (next_rq->rt.highest_prio.next < rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)
>  			break;
> @@ -1955,6 +1960,7 @@ static void tell_cpu_to_push(struct rq *rq)
>  		return;
>  
>  	rq->rt.push_flags = RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING;
> +	atomic_inc(&cpu_rq(cpu)->rt.ipi_count);
>  
>  	irq_work_queue_on(&rq->rt.push_work, cpu);
>  }
> @@ -1974,11 +1980,12 @@ static void try_to_push_tasks(void *arg)
>  
>  	rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu);
>  	src_rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_read(&rq->rt.ipi_count));
>  
>  again:
>  	if (has_pushable_tasks(rq)) {
>  		raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> -		push_rt_task(rq);
> +		push_rt_tasks(rq);

Maybe as a comment around here?

>  		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2000,7 +2007,7 @@ again:
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->push_lock);
>  
>  	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> -		return;
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * It is possible that a restart caused this CPU to be
> @@ -2011,7 +2018,10 @@ again:
>  		goto again;
>  
>  	/* Try the next RT overloaded CPU */
> +	atomic_inc(&cpu_rq(cpu)->rt.ipi_count);
>  	irq_work_queue_on(&rt_rq->push_work, cpu);
> +out:
> +	atomic_dec(&rq->rt.ipi_count);
>  }

I have a vague feeling we're duplicating state, but I can't seem to spot
it, maybe I'm wrong.

Looks about right, but could use a comment, this stuff is getting rather
subtle.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] sched/rt: Avoid sending an IPI to a CPU already doing a  push Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-06-24 17:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Avoid sending an IPI to a CPU already doing a  push Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-06-30 20:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Avoid sending an IPI to a CPU already doing a  push Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-08 17:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Avoid sending an IPI to a CPU already doing a  push Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-07-08 17:20 +0200

csiph-web