Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1435970
| From | Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller |
| Date | 2016-07-03 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rQRbX-1LP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <rOqIW-co-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOGaZ-1Du-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOKeB-4s2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOKeB-4s2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOKHE-4FX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 06/27/16 19:49, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@kernel.org): >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'll have to study these more. But from what I saw so far, it looks to >>> me that a separate tool would be needed to read taskstats and if that >>> tool is not taken by distros, the users would not be any wiser, right? >>> With cgroup (or /proc), no new tools would be needed. >> >> That is a factor but shouldn't be a deciding factor in designing our >> user-facing interfaces. Please also note that kernel source tree >> already has tools/ subdirectory which contains userland tools which >> are distributed along with the kernel. > > And, if you take audit+cgroup approach then no tools are needed. So long > as you can have audit print out the cgroups for a task as part of the > capability audit record. > The attached patch would make any uses of capabilities generate audit messages. It works for simple tests as you can see from the commit message, but unfortunately the call to audit_cgroup_list() deadlocks the system when booting a full blown OS. There's no deadlock when the call is removed. I guess that in some cases, cgroup_mutex and/or css_set_lock could be already held earlier before entering audit_cgroup_list(). Holding the locks is however required by task_cgroup_from_root(). Is there any way to avoid this? For example, only print some kind of cgroup ID numbers (are there unique and stable IDs, available without locks?) for those cgroups where the task is registered in the audit message? I could remove the cgroup part from the audit message entirely, but then knowing which capabilities were used in what cgroup gets much more difficult. The rest of the patch would be useful without it and of course simpler. In my earlier versions a per-task cap_used variable summarized all uses of capabilities, but it was not clear when to reset the variable (fork? exec? capset?), so it's gone for now. This was also used to rate limit printing audit messages by only acting when each capability was first used by the task, but now all uses of capabilities trigger audit logging. Could that become a problem? I think it only makes sense to summarize capability use per cgroup (via taskstats). -Topi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-06-23 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-06-24 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-06-24 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-06-24 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-06-24 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-06-24 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-06-27 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-06-27 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: audit capability use kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-07-03 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-07-07 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2016-07-08 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-07-09 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-24 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-06-24 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-06-28 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 13:30 +0200
csiph-web