Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1433924

Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1 is in long mode.

From Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1 is in long mode.
Date 2016-06-29 19:30 +0200
Message-ID <rPrtf-72Q-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rLkgG-1Ny-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNfmy-41u-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNz1T-8uF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNzbA-6g-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:10:03PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 15:04, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 06:03:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 18/06/2016 11:01, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> >>> Cross-checking the KVM/VMX VMREAD emulation code with the Intel Software
> >>> Developper Manual Volume 3C - "VMREAD - Read Field from Virtual-Machine
> >>> Control Structure", I found that we're enforcing that the destination
> >>> operand is NOT located in a read-only data segment or any code segment when
> >>> the L1 is in long mode - BUT that check should only happen when it is in
> >>> protected mode.
> >>>
> >>> Shuffling the code a bit to make our emulation follow the specification
> >>> allows me to boot a Xen dom0 in a nested KVM and start HVM L2 guests
> >>> without problems.
> >>
> >> That's great, and I'm applying the patch, but it's also pretty weird. :)
> >>  Do you have a pointer to Xen source code that does a VMREAD into a
> >> read-only data segment or a code segment?
> > 
> > It is indeed pretty weird.  Looking at the Xen stack trace, it looks like
> > the vmread is writing to an on-stack buffer, and surely it must be writable
> > so I wonder if Xen might not be using an executable stack for some reason?
> > That would be a bit scary so I'm surely missing something.
> > 
> > Is there an easy way to know from my KVM host the different segment
> > permission setup by the guest?
> 
> Remove your patch, call dump_vmcs() where the #GP is injected, and
> you'll find the VMCS (including segment permissions, but not the
> instruction info field---you probably should add it) in dmesg.
> 

Thanks for the heads up :)

I've had a bit more time to spend on this this morning and attached is the
VMCS dump.  I've look at the vmcs_instruction_info and it appears the
segment referenced is SS (which is in sync with the backtrace where the
instruction causing the vmexit is "vmread %rbp, %rbp), and it has awkward
attributes:

  SS:   sel=0x0000, attr=0x1c000, limit=0xffffffff, base=0x0000000000000000

The lower 16 bits are all zero so KVM VMX emulation was injecting the GP(0)
because we were about to write to a read-only segment.  At least the stack
isn't executable from what I can tell!

Attached is the full VMCS dump where I've added a printk() to show the
'type' (all zeroes) and vmcs_instruction_info in case my above analysis is
complete non-sense.

Quentin

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1  is in long mode. Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> - 2016-06-24 15:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1  is in long mode. Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-24 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1  is in long mode. Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> - 2016-06-29 19:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1  is in long mode. Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-29 22:50 +0200

csiph-web