Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1434426

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Initialise power partitions early

From Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Initialise power partitions early
Date 2016-06-30 12:20 +0200
Message-ID <rPHeF-8kN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rOZnk-6lK-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOZnk-6lK-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:20:42PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> If CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS is not enabled, then power partitions
> associated with a device will not be enabled automatically by the PM
> core when the device is in use. To avoid situations where a device in
> a power partition is to be used but the partition is not enabled,
> initialise the power partitions for Tegra early in the boot process and
> if CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS is not enabled, then power on all
> partitions defined in the device-tree blob.
> 
> Note that if CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS is not enabled, after the
> partitions are turned on, the clocks and resets used as part of the
> sequence for turning on the partition are released again as they are no
> longer needed by the PMC driver. Another benefit of this is that this
> avoids any issues of sharing resets between the PMC driver and other
> device drivers that may wish to independently control a particular
> reset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index 1f702538f8ec..64678ff2173e 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ error:
>  static void tegra_powergate_add(struct tegra_pmc *pmc, struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	struct tegra_powergate *pg;
> -	bool off;
> +	bool off, err = true;
>  	int id;
>  
>  	pg = kzalloc(sizeof(*pg), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -819,6 +819,9 @@ static void tegra_powergate_add(struct tegra_pmc *pmc, struct device_node *np)
>  	if (tegra_powergate_of_get_resets(pg, np, off))
>  		goto remove_clks;
>  
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS))
> +		goto power_on_cleanup;
> +
>  	pm_genpd_init(&pg->genpd, NULL, off);
>  
>  	if (of_genpd_add_provider_simple(np, &pg->genpd))
> @@ -828,6 +831,11 @@ static void tegra_powergate_add(struct tegra_pmc *pmc, struct device_node *np)
>  
>  	return;
>  
> +power_on_cleanup:
> +	if (off)
> +		WARN_ON(tegra_powergate_power_up(pg, true));
> +	err = false;
> +
>  remove_resets:
>  	while (pg->num_resets--)
>  		reset_control_put(pg->resets[pg->num_resets]);
> @@ -845,14 +853,23 @@ free_mem:
>  	kfree(pg);
>  
>  error:
> -	dev_err(pmc->dev, "failed to create power domain for %s\n", np->name);
> +	if (err)
> +		dev_err(pmc->dev, "failed to configure partition %s\n",
> +			np->name);

This is beginning to look very spaghetti-like. Do we really need the
error message here? Could we instead add more explicit error messages
before the gotos above?

Thierry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH 1/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Initialise power partitions early Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-28 13:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Initialise power partitions early Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 12:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Initialise power partitions early Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-30 12:30 +0200

csiph-web