Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1433069
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs |
| Date | 2016-06-28 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rP3hf-rd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rMrSN-579-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:12:36PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> +#define CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(_name) \
> + static ssize_t show_##_name(struct device *dev, \
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
> + { \
> + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, dev->id); \
> + \
> + if (info->reg_midr) \
> + return sprintf(buf, "0x%016x\n", info->reg_##_name); \
> + else \
> + return 0; \
> + } \
> + static DEVICE_ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
> +
> +CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(midr);
> +CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(revidr);
Since exposing these values is aimed at JIT code (and not human
readable), wouldn't it make more sense to present the binary value
instead of the ascii transformation?
--
Catalin
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-06-28 17:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2016-06-28 18:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-06-28 18:30 +0200
csiph-web