Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1407733
| From | Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 |
| Date | 2016-05-26 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rDbke-3an-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rD82Z-1j7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rD8mn-1pw-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rDaRb-30z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > Pulled and then immediately unpulled again. > > .. and having thought it over, I ended up re-pulling again, so now > it's going through my build test. > > Consider this discussion a strong encouragement to *not* do this in > the future - sending me pull requests at the end of the merge window > without them having been in linux-next is a no-no, unless those pull > requests are small and trivial (or have fixes that I'd pull even > outside the merge window, of course). Thank you! We'll be sure we include things in -next well beforehand next time around, especially if it's a big diff like this one. One point of clarification, though: in the past I've squashed down fixes discovered during testing if the branch hasn't hit a stable tree yet (e.g., your tree). AIUI this is(was?) standard procedure for things in -next. Do you want us to avoid squashing if we are creeping up on pull request time, or are you primarily interested in, say, seeing that what has been in -next for a while is substantially the same as what you pull, and has perhaps been there unmodified for at least a few days? Or would you rather see fixup patches if we identify issues in the last few days of testing? Thanks- sage
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> - 2016-05-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-26 20:40 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> - 2016-05-26 21:10 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-26 22:00 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-05-26 22:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-26 23:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-26 23:20 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> - 2016-05-26 23:50 +0200
Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph updates for 4.7-rc1 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-27 04:20 +0200
csiph-web