Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon

From	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon
Date	2016-05-24 09:20 +0200
Message-ID	<rCeNc-dQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rBMed-7rN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rC2sG-Qg-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCagy-5zr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCagy-5zr-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rCetQ-8jR-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

2016-05-24 14:59 GMT+08:00 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>:
> On 05/24/2016 04:25 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2016-05-24 10:19 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>:
>>> 2016-05-24 2:01 GMT+08:00 David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>:
>>>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I'm ok with this patch, but I'd like to better understand the target
>>>> workloads. What type of workloads do you expect to benefit from this?
>>>
>>> dynticks guests I think is one of workloads which can get benefit,
>>> there are lots of upcoming fire timers captured by my feature. Even
>>> during TCP testing. And also the workload of Yang's.
>>
>> Do you think I should add an module parameter to enable/disable it
>> during module insmod or current patch is fine?
>
> What about getting rid of this hunk
>
> -               val = 10000;
> +               val = halt_poll_ns_base;
>
>
> and then rename "halt_poll_ns_base" into "halt_poll_ns_timer" that
> can be changed as module parameter?

Good idea, actually I remember Paolo mentioned to change this as an
module parameter in another thread.

>
> I also experimented with an s390 implementation, which seems pretty straightforward.
> It is probably something like the following (whitespace damaged due to pcopy/paste)
> and needs more testing.

Great work, Christian. I will send out a new version w/ module parameter.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

Thread

[PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 02:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> - 2016-05-23 20:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 04:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 04:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-05-24 09:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will  fire soon David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-05-27 08:50 +0200

csiph-web