Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #4626

Re: tracking security issues without CVEs

From Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: tracking security issues without CVEs
Date 2016-03-06 19:00 +0100
Message-ID <r9L8d-8ix-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r9yE2-8rb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9JpL-7i6-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Brian, hi Paul,

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:59:43PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 03:33:16PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > Just wondering if there is some other way we can track security issues
> > for when CVEs are not available.
> > 
> > Thinking of imagemagick here, it has a lot of security issues, and
> > requests for CVEs are not getting any responses.
> 
> Creating individual bugs in the Debian BTS, including more details
> like fixing commits would be a great start, since we use either CVEs
> or references to the Debian BTS in DSAs (and DLAs). Furthermore the
> security-tracker handles both (you can actually search items there via
> either CVE id, bug number or package name).
> 
> The original CVE request at
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/12/24/1 was IMHO not
> fully optimal, since it just pasted a collection of items. Adding
> references to fixing commits would have helped to get CVEs assigned to
> issues.  The original request at least makes it really hard to
> identify the issues and make sure the CVEs are assigned correctly.

Just one comment which I forgot to address in the previous mail,
regarding the OVE identifiers. The question about the CVE assignments
were just re-raised yesterday on oss-security. The whole might look
promissing indeed. But I think as well that is right now to early to
start adopting these for not yet assigned issues. Instead follow the
current discussion on oss-security and let's see if across
distributions there is going to be some consensus/approach for this
issue.

For the record, the thread is starting at 

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/03/04/4

where Kurt Seifried from Red Hat raised the concern.

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

tracking security issues without CVEs Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz> - 2016-03-06 05:40 +0100
  Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 16:10 +0100
  Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 17:10 +0100
    Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 19:00 +0100
      Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 23:40 +0100
      Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-03-10 21:00 +0100
        Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-11 01:30 +0100
    Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 23:40 +0100
  Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2016-03-12 16:00 +0100
    Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-13 14:00 +0100
      Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@orangeseeds.org> - 2016-03-22 15:30 +0100
        Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-23 04:10 +0100
          Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-03-23 20:10 +0100
            Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Andrew Deck <andrew.hastings.deck@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:40 +0200
              Re: tracking security issues without CVEs Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-04-28 08:30 +0200

csiph-web