Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1345724

Re: [PATCH v5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism

From Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism
Date 2016-02-29 12:40 +0100
Message-ID <r7ulc-2qo-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r6nOQ-1Jb-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <r6nOQ-1Jb-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7ulc-2qo-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:18:28AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > +static int __init amd_power_pmu_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	int i, ret;
> > > +	u64 tmp;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!x86_match_cpu(cpu_match))
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ACC_POWER))
> > > +		return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > +	cores_per_cu = amd_get_cores_per_cu();
> > > +	cu_num = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores / cores_per_cu;
> > 
> > Please use the new package management functions which are on the way to tip.
> > 
> Can you give me some hints?

http://git.kernel.org/tip/1f12e32f4cd5243ae46d8b933181be0d022c6793

topology_max_packages() is what you want.
 
> > You cannot issue the CPU STARTING callback on present, but not online cpus.
> > 
> 
> Do you mean we should change for_each_present_cpu to
> for_each_online_cpu?
> 
> My orignal intent here, it's to allocate data structures of
> "power_pmu_masks" for each core.

Sure, you can allocate stuff for present cpus, but you cannot call the
CPU_STARTING callback for offline cpus.

> But now, I think we needn't below codes, right?

-ENOPARSE
 
> for_each_online_cpu(i)
>         power_cpu_init(i);

You still need that.

> > > +
> > > +	__perf_cpu_notifier(power_cpu_notifier);
> > > +
> > > +	ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu_class, "power", -1);
> > > +	if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
> > > +		pr_warn("AMD Power PMU registration failed\n");
> > 
> > 
> > So that leaves the notifier installed and leaks all the allocated memory.
> > 
> 
> OK, do you mean "issue CPU_STARTING callback on present cpus" will
> cause the memory leak here? Could you please explain more?

Oh well, can you actually read your own code? You allocate a gazillion of
memory in power_cpu_prepare() and on error you just leak it.

Thanks,

	tglx

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting  mechanism Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-26 11:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power  reporting mechanism Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-02-26 11:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting  mechanism Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-29 12:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power  reporting mechanism Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-03-01 15:00 +0100

csiph-web