Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1345304

Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] block-throttle: proportional throttle

From Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] block-throttle: proportional throttle
Date 2016-02-28 16:10 +0100
Message-ID <r7b8S-4kZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r56Q1-3YI-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi!

> The problem is we don't know the max bandwidth a disk can provide for a
> specific workload, which depends on the device and IO pattern. The estimated
> bandwidth by patch 1 will be always not accurate unless the disk is already in
> max bandwidth. To solve this issue, we always over estimate the bandwidth. Over
> esitmate bandwidth, workload dispatchs more IO, estimated bandwidth becomes
> higher, dispatches even more IO. The loop will run till we enter a stable
> state, in which the disk gets max bandwidth. The 'slightly adjust and run into
> stable state' is the core algorithm the patch series use. We also use it to
> detect inactive cgroup.

Ok, so you want to reach a steady state, but what if workloads varies
a lot?

Lets say random writes for ten minutes, then linear write.

Will the linear write be severely throttled because of the previous
seeks?

Can a task get bigger bandwidth by doing some additional (useless)
work?

Like "I do bigger reads in the random read phase, so that I'm not
throttled that badly when I do the linear read"?
								Pavel

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] block-throttle: proportional throttle Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-02-28 16:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] block-throttle: proportional throttle Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> - 2016-03-01 06:30 +0100

csiph-web