Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1346820
| From | "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table |
| Date | 2016-03-01 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7WKu-3T3-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r3TBv-5OY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3TBv-5OY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7t5M-1ES-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r7VbI-31f-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:10:24AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 10:12 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables, > > > this replaces the custom section solution with a > > > generic solution. > > > > > > This also demos the use of the .rodata (SECTION_RO) > > > linker tables. > > > > > > Tested with 0 built-in firmware, 1 and 2 built-in > > > firmwares successfully. > > > > I think we'd do better to rip this support out entirely. It just > > isn't needed; firmware can live in an initramfs and don't even need > > *any* actual running userspace support to load it from there these > > days, do we? > > We have lots of SCSI drivers with built in firmware. The obvious > examples are 53c700, aic7xxx and aic79xx. For them, we actually have > the firmware compilers in tree. The firmware model they use just isn't > amenable to the firmware loader: they're not monolithic blobs, it's a > set of firmware scripts we use to handle particular operations before > giving control back to the host, so the firmware and the driver are > very much symbiotic. I'm in the process of doing some other cleanups with the firmware_class stuff so that odd requirements get supported but clean interfaces are also not hampered by these odd requirements, so I'll take a look at this later. If you have other oddball firmware requirements please let me know so I can also keep in mind. > On the other hand, I don't think any of them uses firmware sections, so > it's not an argument for not ripping out this type. Thanks for confirming. I'll rip this out. Luis
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - 2016-02-29 11:20 +0100
Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> - 2016-02-29 20:00 +0100
Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-03-01 17:20 +0100
Re: [RFC v2 3/7] firmware: port built-in section to linker table "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-03-01 19:00 +0100
csiph-web