Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1343441

RE: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled

From "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled
Date 2016-02-25 21:00 +0100
Message-ID <r6aeS-g0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r3uMO-4Fh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Rgm-4hQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3Wg2-7Up-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5L6O-7D3-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Steph,

On 2016.02.24 08:20 Stephane Gasparini wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote: 
>>> On 2016.02.19 03:12 Stephane Gasparini wrote:
>>> 
>>> The issue you are reporting looks like one we improved on android by using 
>>> the average pstate instead of using the last requested pstate
>>> 
>>> We know that this is improving the ffmpeg encoding performance when using the
>>> load algorithm.
>>> 
>>> see patch attached
>>> 
>>> This patch is only applied on get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load however you can give
>>> it a try on get_target_pstate_use_performance
>> 
>> Yes, that type of patch works on the load based approach.
>
> I’m not talking about using average p-state in the scaled_busy computation.
> I’m talking adding the output of the PID (the number of pstate to ad or subtract)
> to the average pstate rather than adding this to the current p-sate.

For the situation we are dealing with here, that would actually make it worse,
wouldn't it?

Let's work through a real very low load example from the Mel V2 patch where
the target pstate is increased whereas it should have been decreased:

Mel patch version 2 (12X hold off added to rjw 3 patch v10 set added to kernel 4.5-rc4):

CPU: 3
Core busy: 105
Scaled busy: 143
Old pstate: 25
New pstate: 34
mperf: 52039
aperf: 55097
tsc: 335265689
freq: 3599750 KHz
Load: 0.02%
Duration (mS): 98.293

New pstate = old pstate + (scaled_busy-setpoint) * p_gain
           = 25 + (143 - 97) * 0.2
           = 34 (as above)

Ave pstate = max_pstate * aperf / mperf
           = 34 * 55097 / 52039
           = 36

Steph average pstate method added to the above:
New pstate = ave pstate + (scaled_busy-setpoint) * p_gain
           = 36 + (143 - 97) * 0.2
           = 45 (before clamping)

Now, just for completeness show the no Mel patch math:
Scaled busy = Core busy * max_pstate / old pstate * sample time / duration
            = 105 * 34 / 25 * 10 / 98.293
            = 14.53
New pstate = old pstate + (scaled_busy-setpoint) * p_gain
            = 25 + (14.53 - 97) * .2
            = 8.5
            = 16 clamped minimum

Regardless, I coded the average pstate method and observe little
difference between it and the Mel V2 patch with limited testing.

... Doug

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled Stephane Gasparini <stephane.gasparini@linux.intel.com> - 2016-02-24 18:10 +0100
  RE: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-02-25 21:00 +0100

csiph-web