Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #594250
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! |
| Date | 2016-08-22 21:59 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <r69s8d-kc7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <np7vv1$475$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qllk8d-4sb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57b8f936$0$8219$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> <kvbn8d-slk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57bb653e$0$18067$b1db1813$65575428@news.astraweb.com> |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 8/20/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 8/19/2016 8:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/19/2016 4:00 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> We've all seen the news about the weather. And we are all also familiar >>>>>> with Bert's theory of "heavy air" that has been predicting bad weather >>>>>> for years. And most of us are are aware of fundamental physics >>>>>> principles like the 4 elements: Earth air Fire and water. >>>>>> >>>>>> Heavy air theory clearly states that all elements are conserved! Thus, >>>>>> it is obvious that if Kalifornia is covered in wildfires, that for the >>>>>> conservation theory to hold (Noether's theorem) that somewhere else >>>>>> there must be states covered in water to balance it all out. >>>>>> >>>>>> And that is exactly what we see to day! This is proof beyond question >>>>>> that the theory of Heavy Air is correct! >>>>> >>>>> google "Heavy Air Theory" and you run right into Bert, very famous now. >>>> >>>> I did and no mention of Bert on the first 2 pages of results. >>>> >>>> >>> Google search engine has turned to shit these days. Anyone besides me >>> notice? Oh that's right I"m a kook for thinking that the world is not >>> always the same. >> >> Nope, you are a kook because you use silly, made up words you think are >> clever and believe in all sorts of idiotic conspiracies. >> > Blah, blah, blah. You just run your mouth with nothing to back it up. OK, an example of your silly, made up words: gummint. OK, an example of idiotic conspiracies: that HAARP was anything other than propagation research. <snip kook froth and insults> -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-19 17:00 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 17:07 -0500
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-19 19:39 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-20 00:43 +0000
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 21:54 -0500
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-20 20:43 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-21 01:16 +0000
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-22 16:49 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-22 21:59 +0000
csiph-web