Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #594250

Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again!

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again!
Date 2016-08-22 21:59 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <r69s8d-kc7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <np7vv1$475$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qllk8d-4sb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57b8f936$0$8219$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> <kvbn8d-slk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57bb653e$0$18067$b1db1813$65575428@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 8/20/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 8/19/2016 8:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/19/2016 4:00 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>  We've all seen the news about the weather. And we are all also familiar
>>>>>> with Bert's theory of "heavy air" that has been predicting bad weather
>>>>>> for years. And most of us are are aware of fundamental physics
>>>>>> principles like the 4 elements: Earth air Fire and water.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heavy air theory clearly states that all elements are conserved! Thus,
>>>>>> it is obvious that if Kalifornia is covered in wildfires, that for the
>>>>>> conservation theory to hold (Noether's theorem) that somewhere else
>>>>>> there must be states covered in water to balance it all out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that is exactly what we see to day! This is proof beyond question
>>>>>> that the theory of Heavy Air is correct!
>>>>>
>>>>> google "Heavy Air Theory" and you run right into Bert, very famous now.
>>>>
>>>> I did and no mention of Bert on the first 2 pages of results.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Google search engine has turned to shit these days. Anyone besides me
>>> notice? Oh that's right I"m a kook for thinking that the world is not
>>> always the same.
>>
>> Nope, you are a kook because you use silly, made up words you think are
>> clever and believe in all sorts of idiotic conspiracies.
>>
> Blah, blah, blah. You just run your mouth with nothing to back it up. 

OK, an example of your silly, made up words: gummint.

OK, an example of idiotic conspiracies: that HAARP was anything other
than propagation research.

<snip kook froth and insults>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-19 17:00 -0400
  Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 17:07 -0500
    Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-19 19:39 -0400
    Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-20 00:43 +0000
      Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 21:54 -0500
      Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-20 20:43 -0400
        Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-21 01:16 +0000
          Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-22 16:49 -0400
            Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-22 21:59 +0000

csiph-web