Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1340176
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING |
| Date | 2016-02-23 03:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5aAh-6VG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r128j-2LZ-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2Vm3-4ZP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 15:21 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 17:16 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > This patch provides VIRT_CPU_ACCOUTING to PPC32 architecture. > > PPC32 doesn't have the PACA structure, so we use the task_info > > structure to store the accounting data. > > > > In order to reuse on PPC32 the PPC64 functions, all u64 data has > > been replaced by 'unsigned long' so that it is u32 on PPC32 and > > u64 on PPC64 > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> > > --- > > Changes in v3: unlike previous version of the patch that was inspired > > from IA64 architecture, this new version tries to reuse as much as > > possible the PPC64 implementation. > > > > PPC32 doesn't have PACA and past discusion on v2 version has shown > > that it is not worth implementing a PACA in PPC32 architecture > > (see below benh opinion) > > > > benh: PACA is actually a data structure and you really really don't want it > > on ppc32 :-) Having a register point to current works, having a register > > point to per-cpu data instead works too (ie, change what we do today), > > but don't introduce a PACA *please* :-) > > And Ben never replied to my reply at the time: > > "What is special about 64-bit that warrants doing things differently from 32 > -bit? Nothing. It's just historical cruft. But we're not realistically going to get rid of it anytime soon on 64-bit. > What is the difference between PACA and "per-cpu data", other than the > obscure name?" Not much. The pacas are allocated differently to per-cpu data, they're available earlier in boot etc. What we'd like is to have r13 point to the per-cpu data area, and then the contents of the paca could just be regular per-cpu data. But like I said above that's a big change. cheers
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-02-11 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> - 2016-02-12 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> - 2016-02-14 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-02-15 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2016-02-16 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-02-17 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2016-02-23 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-02-23 03:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2016-02-23 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc32: provide VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-02-23 04:30 +0100
csiph-web