Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1339679
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility |
| Date | 2016-02-22 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r51dE-8d4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r4Wxk-4RK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4Wxk-4RK-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4Xto-5Eo-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r513Y-7RT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:52:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:07:02AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > +static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + return rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_package_id(cpu)];
> > > +}
> >
> > > @@ -370,6 +378,7 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct pe
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > /* must be done before validate_group */
> > > + pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(event->cpu);
> > > event->cpu = pmu->cpu;
> > > event->pmu_private = pmu;
> >
> > This again looks like pmu_private is 'trivially' replacable with
> > something like:
> >
> > static inline struct rapl_pmu *event_to_rapl_pmu(struct perf_event *event)
> > {
> > return cpu_to_rapl_pmu(event->cpu);
> > }
>
> Yes, it is. But that's 3 loads versus 1 and we have that in the perf fastpath,
> so I prefer to keep the pmu_private add on.
OK, fair enough.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:10 +0100
Re: [patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-22 13:10 +0100
Re: [patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 17:00 +0100
Re: [patch V2 26/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Convert it to a per package facility Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-22 17:10 +0100
csiph-web