Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1338504

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: cma: split out in_cma check to separate function

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:12:03 +0100 Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@axis.com> wrote:

> Split out the logic in cma_release() which checks if the page is in the
> contiguous area to a new function which can be called separately.  ARM
> will use this.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/cma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cma.h
> @@ -27,5 +27,17 @@ extern int cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
>  					unsigned int order_per_bit,
>  					struct cma **res_cma);
>  extern struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, size_t count, unsigned int align);
> +
>  extern bool cma_release(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages, unsigned int count);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> +extern bool in_cma(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages,
> +		   unsigned int count);
> +#else
> +static inline bool in_cma(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages,
> +			  unsigned int count)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif

Calling it "pages" is weird.  I immediately read it as a `struct page **'. 
Drop the 's' please.  Or call it `start_page' if you wish to retain the
"we're dealing with more than one page here" info.

And `nr_pages' is a better name than `count'.  

And `in_cma' seems rather ...  brief.  And it breaks the convention that
interface identifiers start with the name of the subsystem.  Look at the rest
of cma.h: cma_get_base(), cma_get_size() cma_declare_contiguous(), etc -
let's not break that.

>  #endif
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index ea506eb..55cda16 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -426,6 +426,23 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, size_t count, unsigned int align)
>  	return page;
>  }
>  
> +bool in_cma(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages, unsigned int count)

A bit of documentation would be nice.

> +{
> +	unsigned long pfn;
> +
> +	if (!cma || !pages)
> +		return false;

Is this actually needed?  If there's no good reason for the test, let's leave
it out because it will just be hiding bugs in the caller.

> +	pfn = page_to_pfn(pages);
> +
> +	if (pfn < cma->base_pfn || pfn >= cma->base_pfn + cma->count)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	VM_BUG_ON(pfn + count > cma->base_pfn + cma->count);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cma_release() - release allocated pages
>   * @cma:   Contiguous memory region for which the allocation is performed.

Apart from those cosmeticish things, no objections from me.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 1/2] mm: cma: split out in_cma check to separate function Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@axis.com> - 2016-02-19 09:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: cma: split out in_cma check to separate function Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> - 2016-02-19 14:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: cma: split out in_cma check to separate  function Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-19 22:30 +0100

csiph-web