Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards

From	David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards
Date	2020-02-25 13:13 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<r3331v$ij9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <r31d3h$mqm$1@news.albasani.net> <r31ihr$d2b$1@dont-email.me> <r32hdn$7nq$1@news.albasani.net> <r32nep$k8r$1@dont-email.me> <r32ppe$o9a$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 25/02/2020 10:35, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Maybe these "exotic" compilers aren't relevant to you, but they are very
>> relevant to people who use them.  If you think the world revolves around
>> Windows programming with MSVC, go to an MSVC-specific forum.  This is
>> comp.lang.c, where any kind of C compiler is as relevant as any other.
> 
> And I've never seen anyone here who reported to use such an exotic
> compiler.
> 

I have used "exotic compilers" regularly over the years - as have a good
many people in this group.  I have maybe 10-15 different C compilers
installed on my machines, not counting different versions.  A couple
were bought on 5¼" floppies.  I don't use the older ones much, but
occasionally I need to maintain ancient projects - I keep them all
available.

But here's the thing - I don't know which ones support "pragma once" or
not.  I don't care.  It is utterly pointless to use an unnecessary
non-standard feature that some compilers support, when there is a
perfectly good standard feature that /all/ compilers support.  (I've
nothing against using compiler-specific features if they are useful and
portability is not a concern.)

"Pragma once" is, at most, marginally more convenient than an include
guard - and comes with much vaguer semantics and lower portability.  If
MSVC (where "pragma once" is apparently noticeably faster than include
guards) is all you ever see and use, and "pragma once" works for your
projects, then you use it.  Just don't expect that the rest of the C
programming world to follow suit.

Thread

Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 22:08 +0300
  Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 20:28 +0100
  Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-02-24 19:40 +0000
    Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-24 22:37 +0100
      Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2020-02-25 14:13 +0300
        Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 13:03 +0100
          Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-02-29 01:14 +0300
            Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-02-28 22:36 +0000
              Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-02-29 13:28 +0300
            Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-02-29 00:08 +0000
            Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-02-29 07:05 -0500
            Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-01 15:01 +0100
  Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-02-24 14:52 -0500
    Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 21:19 +0100
      Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-02-24 15:48 -0500
        Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 21:53 +0100
          Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-02-24 17:26 -0500
            Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 00:08 +0100
              Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 15:24 -0800
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-02-24 22:20 -0800
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 09:52 +0100
            Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 08:12 +0100
              Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 09:55 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 10:35 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 13:13 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 13:50 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 18:33 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 18:38 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 18:42 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-25 18:46 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-02-25 19:35 +0000
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 21:18 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-02-26 06:40 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-02-25 12:12 -0800
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-02-25 11:55 -0800
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-02-25 21:37 +0100
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-02-26 02:39 +0000
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2020-02-25 23:10 -0400
                Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-02-27 05:39 -0800
  Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-02-24 22:23 +0000
  Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-02-24 21:17 -0800
    Re: Concerning the necessity of include guards Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2020-02-25 13:03 +0100

csiph-web