Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1334183
| From | Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 3/4] ARM: imx: add the platform related rpmsg implementation |
| Date | 2016-02-15 07:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2kFQ-5xp-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qNRkl-6V7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNTPg-8o8-101@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVJJ0-4aP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVKF4-4Q6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
+LAKML On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:17:21AM +0000, Richard Zhu wrote: > Hi Shawn: > Thanks for your comments. > Further review would copied to Stefan Agner. Please do not top-posting. > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:06:43PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote: > > From: Richard Zhu <Richard.Zhu@freescale.com> > > > > - add mu driver support, the irq and 4bytes msg of the mu module are > > as the interaction channel between A# core and the M4 core on imx amp > > platforms. > > - register one notify in isr of the mu's irq used by rpmsg. > > - instance the virtual processor, and fill up the virtio_config_ops in > > the platform related rpmsg implementation codes. > > - hard-code the vring storage shared by A# core and M# core on AMP > > SOCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 12 ++ > > arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile | 2 + > > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx_rpmsg.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mu.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > I'm not rpmsg expert, but it seems to me that the driver should be put into drivers/rpmsg/ rather than mach-imx. > [Richard] This part rpmsg codes are closed related to the platform. For example, kinds of ops callback functions. > Thus, these codes are placed into arch/arm/mach-imx/ folder. BTW, so does to omap rpmsg implementation. > http://omappedia.org/wiki/RPMsg_Kernel_Sources I just took a closer look at this. What the omappedia page above describes is an OMAP rpmsg implementation in a vendor tree which is in turn based on a relatively old kernel version, i.e. v3.0. I guess the implementation is a base of what mainline has today on remoteproc/rpmsg support, but they are somehow different. For example, on mainline kernel today, there is no remoteproc/rpmsg code in arch/arm/plat-omap. And, instead of handling rpmsg with a platform specific driver, remoteproc encapsulates the rpmsg support. You can find the details in commit ac8954a41393 (remoteproc: create rpmsg virtio device). I suggest you look at the mainline code today instead of any old implementation for reference. And in any case, with device tree support to populate platform device as needed, it's a wrong to put remoteproc/rpmsg related driver code into arch/arm/mach-imx. Shawn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC 3/4] ARM: imx: add the platform related rpmsg implementation Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-15 07:20 +0100 RE: [RFC 3/4] ARM: imx: add the platform related rpmsg implementation Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> - 2016-02-15 07:50 +0100
csiph-web