Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #164177

Re: Good keyboard

From rlharris@oplink.net
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Good keyboard
Date 2016-02-15 03:40 +0100
Message-ID <r2heV-31E-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <r1Psm-1ot-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r1QRr-2ra-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r20nM-e9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2e7p-154-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2gVA-2Vi-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, February 14, 2016 7:12 pm, Gary Roach wrote:
...
>> I've been using a microsoft Ergonomic model 4000 v.1 for years. I love
>> it. I recently looked around for a replacement ( turned out not to be the
>> problem). I found that the newer Microsoft keyboards were garbage in
>> comparison. The only one that came close was a Fellows for which I can
>> not remember the model.

I enjoyed using the thin Apple keyboard, but put it away a few years back
when I could not figure out the proper xkb category; but I think I now
know how to specify the keyboard to the Debian installer.

>> I spend a lot of time on the keyboard and much
>> prefer the slanted ergonomic layout.

I did not notice any comments on my comparison of a computer keyboard with
a piano keyboard in this respect; but that also is something to consider. 
Who would suffer from poor "ergonomics" more than would the pianist?

>> I don't understand the fascination with the Dvorak keyboard. While I
>> will admit that it is more efficient than the qwerty lay out, this
>> really will come into play if you can type faster than 150 wpm or so.
>> Who can?

Perhaps you should consider your definition of efficiency.  I live at the
keyboard, and to me the measure of that which you term "efficiency"
involves consideration of a number of factors, including fatigue,
typographical error rate, and intuitiveness of the layout; the words per
minute count is at the bottom of my list.

To me, one of the greatest benefits of the Dvorak layout comes in entry of
text which incudes numerals.  With the Classic Dvorak layout, the
keystrokes for numerals are instinctive; thus I seldom make an error. 
Such was not the case forty years ago when I could type 120 wpm on QWERTY
on a manual keybar typewriter.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Good keyboard David Niklas <doark@mail.com> - 2016-02-11 06:20 +0100
  Re: Good keyboard David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-02-11 19:30 +0100
    Re: Good keyboard Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2016-02-11 21:30 +0100
    Re: Good keyboard Glenn English <ghe@srv.slsware.net> - 2016-02-11 22:00 +0100
    Re: Good keyboard shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 06:50 +0100
      Re: Good keyboard Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 07:50 +0100
        Re: Good keyboard Glenn Holmer <shadowm@lyonlabs.org> - 2016-02-13 18:30 +0100
          Re: Good keyboard jdd <jdd@dodin.org> - 2016-02-13 19:20 +0100
            Re: Good keyboard martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> - 2016-02-13 22:00 +0100
              Re: Good keyboard rlharris@oplink.net - 2016-02-13 23:30 +0100
                Re: Good keyboard martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> - 2016-02-14 09:40 +0100
                Re: Good keyboard Gary Roach <gary719_list1@verizon.net> - 2016-02-15 00:20 +0100
                Re: Good keyboard Gary Roach <gary719_list1@verizon.net> - 2016-02-15 03:20 +0100
                Re: Good keyboard rlharris@oplink.net - 2016-02-15 03:40 +0100

csiph-web