Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #164217

Re: BTRFS failed

From Pavel Volkov <sailor@lists.xtsubasa.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: BTRFS failed
Date 2016-02-16 07:40 +0100
Message-ID <r2HsL-408-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r27pg-4Un-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r29r4-6n1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2p2O-8en-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On понедельник, 15 февраля 2016 г. 13:50:57 MSK, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:10:07PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> Surely you mean LUKS on top of btrfs?
>
> I don't think that's possible. If you want btrfs and encryption 
> the advice is
> to do the encryption *underneath* btrfs, because btrfs does not support
> encryption itself.

Why, you can also enable hardware encryption in SSD sometimes :) It might 
not be so strong as LUKS though.
Does TRIM work on LUKS, BTW? Certainly barriers shouldn't work, that's 
probably why Bhasker's FS was damaged.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

BTRFS failed Bhasker C V <bhasker@unixindia.com> - 2016-02-14 17:10 +0100
  Re: BTRFS failed Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-02-14 19:20 +0100
    Re: BTRFS failed Bhasker C V <bhasker@unixindia.com> - 2016-02-14 21:00 +0100
    Re: BTRFS failed Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 04:00 +0100
    Re: BTRFS failed Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2016-02-15 12:00 +0100
      Re: BTRFS failed Pavel Volkov <sailor@lists.xtsubasa.org> - 2016-02-16 07:40 +0100
        Re: BTRFS failed Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2016-02-16 16:10 +0100
  Re: BTRFS failed Pavel Volkov <sailor@lists.xtsubasa.org> - 2016-02-16 07:40 +0100

csiph-web