Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1270486
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats |
| Date | 2015-11-16 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qvxtL-2U5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qu28G-2eq-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qu34K-2QO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:35:58 +0100 > Drivers like vxlan use the recently introduced > udp_tunnel_xmit_skb/udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb APIs. udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb > makes use of ip6tunnel_xmit, and ip6tunnel_xmit, after sending the > packet, updates the struct stats using the usual > u64_stats_update_begin/end calls on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats). > udp_tunnel_xmit_skb makes use of iptunnel_xmit, which doesn't touch > tstats, so drivers like vxlan, immediately after, call > iptunnel_xmit_stats, which does the same thing - calls > u64_stats_update_begin/end on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats). > > While vxlan is probably fine (I don't know?), calling a similar function > from, say, an unbound workqueue, on a fully preemptable kernel causes > real issues: > > [ 188.434537] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/u8:0/6 > [ 188.435579] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 > [ 188.435583] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 4.2.6 #2 > [ 188.435607] Call Trace: > [ 188.435611] [<ffffffff8234e936>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b > [ 188.435615] [<ffffffff81915f3d>] check_preemption_disabled+0x19d/0x1c0 > [ 188.435619] [<ffffffff81915f77>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 > > The solution would be to protect the whole > this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats)/u64_stats_update_begin/end blocks with > disabling preemption and then reenabling it. > > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Jason Arguably, ip6tunnel_xmit() is primarily a ->ndo_start_xmit() and therefore could assume that it only ran inside of a BH disabled code sequence. And as you noted, when this was turned into a general case helper function that guarantee was no longer necessarily there. So another fix could have been to do local_bh_disable() in the udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb() helper. Thanks again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-11-12 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 18:00 +0100
[PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-11-16 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-11-16 20:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-16 20:40 +0100
csiph-web