Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71435

Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals

From Manfred <invalid@add.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals
Date 2020-01-17 01:24 +0100
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <qvqusg$io2$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <qvpvvf$h2p$1@dont-email.me> <92fc27c6-1146-4820-8bb3-54075c5b9fa4@googlegroups.com> <qvqloc$1ami$1@gioia.aioe.org> <6d8cd72d-32d0-43e2-8be9-e6119b44c985@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/16/20 11:43 PM, Öö Tiib wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 January 2020 23:49:14 UTC+2, Manfred  wrote:
>> On 1/16/2020 6:46 PM, Öö Tiib wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 16 January 2020 17:37:31 UTC+2, Paavo Helde  wrote:
>>>> In C++ there is a preprocessor step which logically comes first and
>>>> prepares the preprocessed source consisting of remaining tokens.
>>>> However, preprocessor is line-based, so it ought to conflict with the
>>>> multi-line string literals:
>>>>
>>>> #include <iostream>
>>>>
>>>> #if 1
>>>>
>>>> int main() {
>>>> 	const char* test = R"__(
>>>>
>>>> #else
>>>>
>>>>        )__";
>>>> 	std::cout << test;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> Obviously C++ compilers supporting C++11 are able to cope with that and
>>>> handle the '#else' line as part of the string literal. My question is
>>>> more about how they were able to standardize this behavior? Is there
>>>> still a logically separate preprocessor step or not?
>>>>
>>>> By googling I also find some EBNF formal syntax descriptions for C++,
>>>> but these are different for the preprocessor and for the actual C++
>>>> language. With presence of multi-line string literals, is it even
>>>> possible to provide a self-consistent EBNF formal syntax for the C++
>>>> preprocessor?
>>>
>>> [lex.phases]1.1.
>>> | Physical source file characters are mapped, in an implementation-defined
>>> | manner, to the basic source character set (introducing new-line
>>> | characters for end-of-line indicators) if necessary. The set of
>>> | physical source file characters accepted is implementation-defined. Any
>>> | source file character not in the basic source character set (5.3) is
>>> | replaced by the universal-character-name that designates that
>>> | character. An implementation may use any internal encoding, so long
>>> | as an actual extended character encountered in the source file, and
>>> | the same extended character expressed in the source file as a
>>> | universal-charactername (e.g., using the \uXXXX notation), are
>>> | handled equivalently except where this replacement is reverted (5.4)
>>> | in a *raw* *string* *literal*.
>>>
>>> So the raw string literal is already a token of very first translation
>>> step. Preprocessing takes place in step 4. By that time it has been
>>> string literal for 3 steps already.
>>>
>>
>> (Using n4820.pdf)
>> I think the reference in here of a string literal is a forward reference
>> (to section 5.4 [lex.pptoken]) and it only applies to handling of
>> universal-character-names, it does not define string literals yet.
>>
>> However, step 3 of [lex.phases] says: "The source file is decomposed
>> into preprocessing tokens (5.4)".
>> Preprocessing tokens are defined in [lex.pptoken] (section 5.4 in
>> n4820), and the list includes "string-literal" (specifically, it is
>> defined at p3.1).
>> The following step 4 then executes preprocessing directives.
>>
>> So, yes string literals are processed before preprocessing directives,
>> but one step earlier, not three.
> 
> Are you suggesting what are the raw string literals should be
> re-decided in later steps?
> 
> 

No, "what are the raw string literals" is "decided" in step 3, and not 
in step 1.
I suggest you re-read step 1, more carefully.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2020-01-16 17:37 +0200
  Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-16 09:46 -0800
    Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-16 22:49 +0100
      Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-16 14:43 -0800
        Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Manfred <invalid@add.invalid> - 2020-01-17 01:24 +0100
          Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-16 16:38 -0800
            Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Manfred <invalid@add.invalid> - 2020-01-17 03:27 +0100
  Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2020-01-16 20:07 +0000
  Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2020-01-20 13:53 +0000
    Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2020-01-20 18:31 +0200
    Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-01-20 18:19 +0100
      Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2020-01-21 08:24 +0000
        Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals boltar@nowhere.org - 2020-01-21 16:43 +0000
          Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2020-01-21 19:25 +0200
            Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals boltar@nowhere.org - 2020-01-22 09:58 +0000
              Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals guinness.tony@gmail.com - 2020-01-22 02:11 -0800
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals boltar@nowhere.org - 2020-01-22 10:24 +0000
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-23 22:25 -0500
              Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2020-01-22 13:28 +0200
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals boltar@nowhere.org - 2020-01-22 12:07 +0000
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-22 05:33 -0800
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals boltar@nowhere.org - 2020-01-22 16:03 +0000
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-01-22 10:50 -0800
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals boltar@nowhere.org - 2020-01-23 09:22 +0000
                Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-01-22 18:59 +0100
              Re: C++ preprocessor and multi-line string literals Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2020-01-22 12:03 +0000

csiph-web