Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1271463

Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117)

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117)
Date 2015-11-17 18:10 +0100
Message-ID <qvRVx-7TO-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qvKhk-2Hb-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvKhk-2Hb-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvRC9-7wq-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday 17 November 2015 16:44:53 Will Deacon wrote:
> > 8<----
> > Subject: ARM64: make smp_load_acquire() work with const arguments
> > 
> > smp_load_acquire() uses typeof() to declare a local variable for temporarily
> > storing the output of the memory access. This fails when the argument is
> > constant, because the assembler complains about using a constant register
> > as output:
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1'
> >  used as 'asm' output
> 
> Do you know the usage in the kernel causing this warning?

A newly introduced function in include/net/sock.h:

static inline int sk_state_load(const struct sock *sk)
{
        return smp_load_acquire(&sk->sk_state);
}

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-17 10:00 +0100
  Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-17 17:50 +0100
    Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 18:10 +0100
    Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-17 18:10 +0100
      Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-17 18:20 +0100
        Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-17 20:20 +0100
          Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 11:20 +0100
            RE: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-11-18 13:20 +0100
              Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 13:30 +0100
                RE: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-11-18 16:30 +0100
                Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 16:40 +0100
                RE: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-11-18 17:00 +0100
          RE: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-11-18 11:30 +0100

csiph-web