Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #148871
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Warning in LLVM Clang |
| Date | 2020-01-08 15:11 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <qv4nui$k6m$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <quvg53$q5n$1@dont-email.me> <87eewclgou.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <qv1s14$pi0$1@dont-email.me> <87zhezjpzn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <qv4k2e$ubn$1@dont-email.me> |
On 08/01/2020 14:05, Mehdi Amini wrote: > On 1/7/20 6:03 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 1/6/20 7:28 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > > [...] > >>>> Post the code the does not work for you along with the version if clang >>>> that you are using. >> >> ??? >> > > [...] > > About code I have to say that it a an opensource multi file project. I > am having problem with a GTK+ signal. So it is not simple to send here > just a small code that has the same behavior. It does not matter how big the source is. What you have to do is figure out a minimal, stand-alone, compilable snippet of code that demonstrates the problem. It does not have to be an extraction from the original code - usually it is better to write a new test "foo" function that has the same effect. This process has at least three major benefits: 1. It means other people can help you, because they can see a short bit of code. No one is going to wade through dozens of long source files on github (or whatever) to help, but many are happy to read through a dozen lines of code in a Usenet post. 2. During the process of making such a sample, there is a good chance that you will figure it out yourself, and learn something in the process. This happens often. 3. You can paste the code into <https://godbolt.org> and test it out with different compilers, different versions, different warning settings and flag options. This can be a big help for you in finding out what is going on. > On compiler versions: > > :~$ clang --version > clang version 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 (tags/RELEASE_600/final) > Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > InstalledDir: /usr/bin > > :~$ gcc --version > gcc (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1) 7.4.0 > Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is > NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR > PURPOSE. > >
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-06 17:57 +0330
Warning in LLVM Clang chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2020-01-06 07:47 -0800
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-06 15:58 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 15:32 +0330
Which compiler is it, anyway??? (Was: Warning in LLVM Clang) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2020-01-07 12:58 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-07 14:33 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-08 16:35 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-08 15:11 +0100
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-09 16:15 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-09 14:34 +0100
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-09 17:49 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-09 19:35 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-10 10:28 +0100
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-10 12:39 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-10 12:57 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-10 13:23 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-10 14:09 +0100
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 16:45 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-10 13:20 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 17:20 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 17:24 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-10 23:52 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-01-10 15:29 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-01-10 23:28 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-11 14:21 +0000
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-09 22:08 -0500
Not exactly an "alias", but that's just being a CLC pedant... (Was: Warning in LLVM Clang) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2020-01-10 09:52 +0000
Re: Not exactly an "alias", but that's just being a CLC pedant... (Was: Warning in LLVM Clang) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-10 11:26 +0100
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 16:48 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-01-10 09:34 -0800
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-11 14:41 +0330
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2020-01-06 17:23 +0100
Re: Warning in LLVM Clang Mehdi Amini <atorrses@gmail.com> - 2020-01-07 15:39 +0330
csiph-web