Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29016

Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems

From Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems
Date 2020-01-05 13:44 -0600
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <qutdta$vk4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <qung9m$m79$1@dont-email.me> <qunihq$450$1@dont-email.me> <qurcak$puc$1@dont-email.me> <87blrio1hk.fsf@nightsong.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Paul Rubin wrote:
> pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> writes:
>> As I already wrote many times, I don't have experience with RTOS and
>> task sync mechanism such as semaphores, locks, mutexes, message queues
>> and so on.
>> So I'm not able to understand when a sync is really needed.
>>
>> Could you point on a good simple material to study (online or book)?
> 
> I have found it simplest to have tasks communicate by message passing,
> the so-called "CSP model" (communicating sequential processes), rather
> than fooling around with explicit locks.  With locks you have to worry
> about lock inversion and all kinds of other madness, and your main hope
> of getting it right is formal methods, like Lamport used for the Paxos
> algorithm.  Message passing incurs some cpu overhead because of the
> interprocess communication and context switches, but it gets rid of a
> lot of ways things go wrong.
> 
> If your RTOS supports message passing (look for "mailboxes" in the RTOS
> docs) then I'd say use them.
> 

Mailboxes are just semaphores with extra steps :) When I've written 
mailboxes for use in user space, they usually use a semaphore.

In kernel space, you're already under a "semaphore" ( but still subject 
to asynchronous interrupts ). This of course varies by O/S....

> The language most associated with CSP style is Erlang, which doesn't
> really fit on small embedded devices, but Erlang materials might still
> be a good place to learn about the style.  Erlang inventor Joe
> Armstrong's book might be a good place to start:
> 

Erlang is a fine system,. The ( arguably ) best thing it provides is the
"actor pattern", which applies independent of language choice.

<snip>

-- 
Les Cargill

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-01-03 14:41 +0100
  Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-03 15:19 +0100
    Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 01:25 +0100
      Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 13:32 -0600
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-01-05 16:49 -0500
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 21:05 -0600
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-05 17:08 -0700
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 21:26 -0600
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-05 22:10 -0700
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-06 07:37 -0600
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-06 17:21 -0700
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-07 19:23 -0600
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-01-06 20:36 -0500
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-07 01:38 -0600
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-01-07 06:53 -0500
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-01-06 07:13 -0500
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-07 10:11 +0100
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-01-07 07:05 -0500
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-07 19:34 -0600
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-06 10:44 +0200
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-06 02:51 -0700
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-06 15:39 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-01-06 13:29 -0500
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-06 14:38 -0700
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-07 07:05 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-01-07 13:09 -0500
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-01-07 20:53 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-01-08 08:43 +1100
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-08 00:33 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-01-08 15:26 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-08 00:08 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-07 10:37 +0100
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-06 16:10 -0700
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-07 07:37 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-07 01:49 -0600
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-07 06:43 -0700
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-07 10:21 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-07 06:42 -0700
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-01-07 22:23 -0500
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-09 22:07 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-07 10:54 +0200
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-07 06:43 -0700
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2020-01-06 18:01 +0100
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2020-01-06 19:47 +0200
    Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 01:58 +0100
      Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-01-05 14:26 +1100
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-05 11:21 +0200
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-05 14:07 +0100
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-05 17:46 +0200
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-05 19:08 +0100
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-05 13:56 +0100
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 13:39 -0600
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-01-06 07:44 +1100
            Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 21:00 -0600
              Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-01-06 14:50 +1100
                Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-06 07:12 -0600
      Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-01-04 22:34 -0800
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-01-05 14:12 +0100
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2020-01-05 18:00 +0200
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 13:44 -0600
      Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-01-06 14:52 -0500
      Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-01-06 15:05 -0500
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems gtwrek@sonic.net (gtwrek) - 2020-01-06 22:41 +0000
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2020-01-06 19:50 -0700
          Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2020-01-07 13:26 -0500
  Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2020-01-03 16:28 +0200
    Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 01:37 +0100
      Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2020-01-05 13:46 -0600
        Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2020-01-05 22:44 +0200
  Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-01-03 11:49 -0800
  Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-01-03 22:51 +0200
    Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 01:48 +0100
  Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net> - 2020-01-03 15:34 -0600
  Re: Task priorities in non strictly real-time systems Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-01-03 21:46 -0500

csiph-web