Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #4419
| From | Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: Bug#803204: libiksemel: utterly insecure GNUTLS settings |
| Date | 2015-11-12 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qtWZk-7yp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qokUG-2vz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
I would suggest to use gnutls_set_default_priority() instead of hard-coding a priority string into applications. Your hard coded priority string will be just as obsolete as the hard coded values you are replacing in a couple of years. /Simon
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Bug#803204: libiksemel: utterly insecure GNUTLS settings Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2015-11-12 11:10 +0100
csiph-web