Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #4419

Re: Bug#803204: libiksemel: utterly insecure GNUTLS settings

From Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Re: Bug#803204: libiksemel: utterly insecure GNUTLS settings
Date 2015-11-12 11:10 +0100
Message-ID <qtWZk-7yp-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qokUG-2vz-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

I would suggest to use gnutls_set_default_priority() instead of
hard-coding a priority string into applications.  Your hard coded
priority string will be just as obsolete as the hard coded values you
are replacing in a couple of years.

/Simon

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Bug#803204: libiksemel: utterly insecure GNUTLS settings Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2015-11-12 11:10 +0100

csiph-web