Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #208411
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Remington Rand punched card |
| Date | 2019-12-05 23:09 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy.com |
| Message-ID | <qsc2nq18b0@news2.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <7a1941f4-f27d-4a14-b502-5ba9e6aac0c3@googlegroups.com> |
On 2019-12-05, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: > IBM wasn't the only punched card business. Remington > Rand also had a line of punched card tabulating machines. > > Here are two ads for it: > > https://archive.org/details/Nations-Business-1934-01/page/n55 > > https://archive.org/details/Nations-Business-1934-08/page/n45 If you zoom in on the second one you can see the same 90-column cards that I played with a bit in the late '60s. The cards are the same dimensions as IBM's 80-column cards, and have the same 12 rows, but the 45 columns are divided into upper and lower tiers - perfect for 6-bit codes. > Supposedly, IBM integrated its punched card machines with > its new computers, but Remington kept them separate. > This hurt Remington's computers. > > I don't know the detailed history of Remington Rand, > but I can't help but suspect it was not a well run > company after WW II. I know they hired Gen. Leslie Groves > basically as an expensive figurehead to go around and > make semi-political speeches that the CEO liked. One > books cites that Univac and ERA were basically two > separate competing divisions. > > Maybe things got better when they merged with Sperry. IBM was definitely better organized, although Sperry-Univac felt friendlier. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ "Alexa, define 'bugging'."
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Remington Rand punched card hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2019-12-05 12:29 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2019-12-05 23:09 +0000
Re: Remington Rand punched card hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2019-12-06 13:30 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2019-12-06 13:45 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2019-12-06 13:49 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2019-12-06 14:27 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2019-12-06 19:20 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2019-12-06 13:46 -0800
Re: Remington Rand punched card scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2019-12-08 17:08 +0000
Re: Remington Rand punched card Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2019-12-08 18:59 +0000
Re: Remington Rand punched card Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2019-12-08 20:57 -0800
csiph-web