Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #70017
| From | boltar@nowhere.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an |
| Date | 2019-11-23 17:23 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <qrbpum$j6g$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <qqulj5$jd1$1@dont-email.me> <EGJAF.196091$_i.170118@fx25.am4> <slrnqthuut.2ntj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
On 23 Nov 2019 09:29:01 GMT Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> wrote: >On Fri, 2019-11-22, Vir Campestris wrote: >> On 19/11/2019 11:48, Alf P. Steinbach wrote: >[...] > >> That's interesting. That sound as if you're on my side of the "almost >> always auto" argument I've heard bandied about - not least by the guy >> who owns our coding standards :( > >"Use auto everywhere, and let your IDE tell you what the type is with >a tooltip". I remember asking about that here some years ago -- what >people thought of that advise. I don't remember a clear outcome, except >someone predicted we'd see a few years of auto abuse, followed by a >backlash. Its pretty stupid advice since not everyone uses or wants to use an IDE. If find they just get in the way and offer little over a decent programmers editor and standard command line tools on *nix. And as for Visual Shitshow on Windows, god almighty , how does anyone use that obtuse piece of garbage without going insane.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Substitution failure can be an error "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-18 18:49 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-18 21:54 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2019-11-18 18:12 -0500
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-19 03:53 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-19 12:48 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-19 21:31 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-19 21:20 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-19 22:51 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-19 21:58 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-20 09:19 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-11-20 02:16 -0800
Re: Substitution failure can be an error scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2019-11-20 14:13 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-11-20 08:34 -0800
Re: Substitution failure can be an error David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-21 12:34 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-11-21 05:29 -0800
Re: Substitution failure can be an error David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-21 15:58 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2019-11-20 11:12 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-11-20 04:25 -0800
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-11-20 06:05 -0800
Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an error) Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-22 21:46 +0000
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an error) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-11-23 09:29 +0000
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an boltar@nowhere.co.uk - 2019-11-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an error) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-11-28 12:46 -0800
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an error) "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-24 00:26 +0100
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an error) "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-24 00:28 +0100
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an error) "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-24 00:45 +0100
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an boltar@nowhere.co.uk - 2019-11-24 10:47 +0000
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-24 13:37 +0000
Re: Almost Always Auto? (was Re: Substitution failure can be an boltar@nowhere.co.uk - 2019-11-25 11:08 +0000
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-11-20 18:46 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-11-21 06:02 +0100
Re: Substitution failure can be an error Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-11-21 15:50 +0100
csiph-web