Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #556904

Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled
Date 2016-02-26 18:06 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <qpg6qc-hr8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <31504980-4207-450c-a4d5-318c3f64f7cc@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/atmospheric-convection-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-7/#comment-114096
> 
> 
> Will:
> My point is that no one or group has the slightest clue as to how this

Who is Will and why haven't you figured out how to limit line lengths to
less than 78 characters?


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 09:35 -0800
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 10:14 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:07 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:24 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:11 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:26 -0600
        Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:38 -0800
          Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 17:02 -0600
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 18:06 +0000
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:34 -0600
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:11 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:22 -0600
        Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:26 -0800
          Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:29 -0600
            Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:00 -0800
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:04 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:06 -0600
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:17 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:01 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:24 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:42 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 18:33 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-27 03:52 +0000
                pull or\and push it noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 16:58 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 16:03 -0800
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:05 -0600
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:13 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 20:52 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:05 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:02 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:25 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:47 +0000
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-26 13:03 -0600
  is pulled by noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:46 -0800
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 09:41 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 11:47 -0600
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-07 19:38 +1100
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 01:01 -0800

csiph-web