Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1259404
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Revert "h8300: clocksource" |
| Date | 2015-10-30 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpfSW-58P-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qpfge-4FN-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday 30 October 2015 11:26:08 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This reverts commit 618b902d8c098f2fff188119da7b3184c4bc5483.
>
> The renesas architecture have been dropped and re-introduced two years
> after with a supposed improvement of the code.
>
> While looking at the timer drivers, I see it did not passed a correct code
> review process. No maintainters were in Cc, not code review and no ack
> from them (Thomas and I).
>
> Even if those drivers where already in the tree several years ago, that
> does not prevent them, when re-introduced, to be reviewed again and at
> least acked by the maintainer.
>
> Even if the patches where on lkml@, that does not prevent the different
> sub-system maintainers to be in Cc.
Agreed.
> Instead of that, these drivers passed silently through another tree (arm-soc
> I guess).
No need to speculate when you can look it up easily (it wasn't us):
$ git log --oneline --merges --ancestry-path 618b902d8c098f2fff188119da7b3184c4bc5483.. | tail -n1
55a7d4b85ca1 Merge tag 'for-4.2' of git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux
$ git show 55a7d4b85ca1
commit 55a7d4b85ca1f723d26b8956e8faeff730d0d240
Merge: aefbef10e3ae 07834743f42b
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu Jun 25 13:07:24 2015 -0700
Merge tag 'for-4.2' of git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux
Pull Renesas H8/300 architecture re-introduction from Yoshinori Sato.
We dropped arch/h8300 two years ago as stale and old, this is a new and
more modern rewritten arch support for the same architecture.
I reviewed the series before it was merged, but failed to notice that you
were not on Cc, and I did not look at the clocksource drivers in much
detail (if at all).
> There is legacy code to be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
I found that Yoshinori Sato has always addressed all review comments very
quickly by rewriting the code in a proper manner when mistakes were
pointed out in the other drivers. Maybe you can describe now what the
problems are with the three drivers to give him a chance to fix them?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] Revert "h8300: clocksource" Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2015-10-30 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "h8300: clocksource" Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-30 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "h8300: clocksource" Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2015-10-30 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "h8300: clocksource" Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> - 2015-10-31 05:20 +0100
csiph-web