Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #541556
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide |
| Date | 2015-12-26 00:31 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <qn31lc-mvn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <5NmdnRABkKB0WODLnZ2dnUU7-bOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide >> http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/12/a-not-so-modest-proposal-to-remove-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide/ > > >> "The sooner you start socking away part of your paycheck for >> retirement, the easier it is to hit your goals. If you wait until >> late in your career to start, your goal could be simply out of reach >> unless you take a second job or win the lottery." That axiom is a bit >> like how we've treated carbon emissions: when governments started >> negotiating to limit greenhouse gases in the early 1990s, the >> agreed-upon goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius was >> pretty doable. The continued rise of emissions since then has turned >> that into a tall task, while the 1.5 degree Celsius aspiration added >> to the recent Paris agreement is even taller. >> >> At this point, hitting those targets very likely requires more than >> just shifting away from fossil fuels. We?ll also need ?negative >> emissions??activities that absorb carbon dioxide from smokestacks or >> directly from the atmosphere?in order to squeeze under the line. It?s >> a simple concept but a very big challenge. Some nascent negative >> emission technologies exist, like capturing CO2 from smokestacks and >> pumping it into underground reservoirs. Other proposals, however, >> sound pretty wild and may not work?like dumping iron dust into the >> oceans to spur plankton growth. >> >> One tempting strategy is to imitate nature?s longterm carbon >> control?the weathering of fresh rock. When certain minerals react >> with CO2 in rainwater, they turn into different minerals, and the CO2 >> turns into bicarbonate that ends up in groundwater, rivers, and >> ultimately the ocean. >> Ever heard of photosynthesis, spamming shit head? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 16:40 -0600
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 17:57 -0500
A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:58 -0800
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 14:06 -0500
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-25 23:28 +0000
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 15:47 -0800
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 03:50 -0500
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-26 00:31 +0000
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 18:57 -0600
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 20:16 -0800
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-12-26 05:12 -0800
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 08:17 -0600
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-26 18:56 +0000
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-26 06:33 +0000
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 00:08 -0600
Re: A not-so-modest proposal to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-25 06:57 +0000
csiph-web