Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1250484
| From | Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.12 16/33] isdn/gigaset: reset tty->receive_room when attaching ser_gigaset |
| Date | 2015-10-19 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qleC6-8fX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <qa37l-2Hb-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <qb9aH-7Hp-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbbPd-38F-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgHEK-11w-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiHqV-2Xd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Dropped stable from Cc:. I can't see how this is still relevant for that list.] Hi Tilman, On ma, 2015-10-12 at 11:18 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > While it doesn't make any sense indeed to run two instances of > ldattach > in parallel on one and the same serial port, it is entirely conceivable > that someone might do so inadvertently, by not being aware that one is > running already. I'm wandering off topic a bit, but doesn't that imply that ldattach should bail out with an error if someone tries to do that? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 3.12 16/33] isdn/gigaset: reset tty->receive_room when attaching ser_gigaset Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-10-06 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3.12 16/33] isdn/gigaset: reset tty->receive_room when attaching ser_gigaset Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-10-12 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3.12 16/33] isdn/gigaset: reset tty->receive_room when attaching ser_gigaset Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-10-19 11:10 +0200
csiph-web