Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #274321
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Date | 2016-02-02 16:58 +1100 |
| Organization | "The" government |
| Message-ID | <qig0bb9er0gi9brdv1kd12bmd7gl5he40k@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <1b1f51d0-8d08-43e4-a2a6-3ef6bc985a52@googlegroups.com> <a16c1899-9804-4df9-8495-8f5d7bc99384@googlegroups.com> <fa87b26b-862a-40f7-ae65-829ebdcb299b@googlegroups.com> <hca0bbhm8k1gmjmcaaijbvrkpsm7ppdahu@4ax.com> <db7ec0b3-738e-4e89-b40c-c05d269c3005@googlegroups.com> |
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:13:38 -0800 (PST), joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 11:12:59 PM UTC-5, Government Shill #2 wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:52:34 -0800 (PST), joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 5:26:15 PM UTC-5, edrh...@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> > The difference between contrails and chemtrails. Chemtrails stay visible for hours where as contrails vanish following the plane close >> >> >> >> The temperature of the sky just might be more of a factor. >> > >> >No the determining factor is evaporation. >> >> Yes, and temperature determines evaporation, along with humidity. The >> temperatures at 30,000 feet are in the order of -40° (C of F). Very cold. Very >> cold things don't evaporate very well. >> >> Humidity varies from day to day and from one flight level to another. >> Evaporation is slow in areas of high relative humidity and quicker in low. This >> accounts for the variation from place to place and day to day. >> >> Temperature and relative humidity at various altitudes for the USA can be found >> at this website: >> http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/naconf.html >> >> >Chemtrails don't evaporate as fast as contrails filled with only jet fuel. >> >> Contrails are water vapour. Water is a resultant from burning fuel (a >> hydrocarbon) with oxygen. If there is any residual fuel it would be an extremely >> small percentage. >> >> >Jet fuel evaporates very quickly thus they don't have an everlasting tale. >> >> Jet fuel is burnt in jet engines. Aircraft engine manufacturers spend millions >> of dollars developing engines which burn as close to 100% of the jet fuel >> introduced to the engine as possible. This is called "fuel efficiency" and is a >> big selling point for said engines. >> >> >I spelled the right tale correctly. >> >> No. No you didn't. >> > >The tale is visible for hours. Nope. Still wrong. >Jets dump fuel before landing No. Only if they have to land immediately after takeoff, when they would normally be too heavy to land, and even then they usually fly around and burn the excess off. >these contrails evaporate quickly not like the deadly toxins in Chemtrails that pollute the water and kill off the sheeple. For which there has been no evidence provided, whatsoever. Shill #2 -- Liar, liar, pants on fire. Me
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 11:48 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:00 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 05:06 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:27 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 11:02 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:26 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 19:52 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:12 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 21:13 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 16:58 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:53 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:05 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-02 01:53 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:25 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:51 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:31 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:36 +1100
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:46 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 19:37 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 17:22 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-04 01:25 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 10:47 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:31 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:07 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:34 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:08 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
csiph-web