Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #72002
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Debian 10 "buster" released |
| Date | 2019-07-08 19:19 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <qg01f2$dkn$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qfteh6$v2u$1@dont-email.me> <gof1o0Fh1ddU1@mid.individual.net> <qftssg$ms3$1@dont-email.me> <qfv78u$j6t$2@dont-email.me> <qfvue6$svc$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 08/07/2019 18:27, AnonLinuxUser wrote: > On 7/8/2019 4:52 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 07/07/2019 23:48, AnonLinuxUser wrote: >>> On 7/7/2019 2:07 PM, J.O. Aho wrote: >>>> On 07/07/2019 20.43, AnonLinuxUser wrote: >>>> >>>>> Systemd was designed to take care of the deficiencies in init. >>>> >>>> It's not an init system anymore, it does far more and those breaks >>>> the Unix philosophy of doing just one thing and then do it really well. >>>> >>>> A big issue with systemd as it incorporates so many things, it's the >>>> init system which most frequently has major security issues. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Init just started processes but never managed those processes. >>>> >>>> Other init systems have had management features as restart of >>>> service when it's died, but this causes a problem, there is a reason >>>> why it dies, the reason why it dies should be investigated and >>>> fixed, not just automatically restart it, as it will die soon again. >>>> >>> >>> Which is why Linux moved over to systemd. >>> >>> Apple, a long time ago moved over to this method as well, but it is >>> called launchd. >>> >>> init will start processes, but it usually will just walk away. >>> >>> I guess that's one of many reasons that you don't see UNIX being sold >>> anymove, other than the now macOS. >>> >>> >> Once again your ignorance is on display. >> >> UNIX is not being sold, because it costs money to license. Linux and >> BSD do not. >> > > Neither does macOS. Mac os does cost money to license from apple. It is based on free BSD, Your ignorance astounds > > The real reason was historical way of doing business. Those days are > long gone. It was the good-ol-boy club that sucked off of the profits > of licensing UNIX and the very expensive hardware the it ran on. Those > days are long gone. That's why the UNIX vendors except Solaris and > Apple are out of business. Solaris is now free, with a few strings > attached. Sheesh Whoosh *plonk* -- "I am inclined to tell the truth and dislike people who lie consistently. This makes me unfit for the company of people of a Left persuasion, and all women"
Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-07 07:02 -0500
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-07 07:27 -0700
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-07-07 09:36 -0500
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-07 07:50 -0700
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 12:43 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-07 19:53 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:45 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:50 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-07-08 12:53 +0000
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-07-08 16:17 -0400
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2019-07-08 09:48 -0400
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:19 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 19:17 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:06 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-07-08 17:47 +0000
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-07-07 22:07 +0200
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-07 21:21 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:50 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:54 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:21 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-07 23:53 +0200
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:51 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-08 01:56 +0200
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:22 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-08 20:58 +0200
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:08 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:48 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:52 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:27 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 19:19 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:11 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-07 20:31 -0500
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:29 -0600
Debian 10 "buster" released Jeff-Relf.Me @.@ - 2019-07-08 11:29 -0700
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-08 15:17 -0500
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:12 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2019-07-09 00:24 +0200
"Antimalware Service Executable" Jeff-Relf.Me @.@ - 2019-07-08 16:00 -0700
Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" "Snowden" <Edmail@fromrussiawithlove.net> - 2019-07-08 18:10 -0500
Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Ketch <nobody@home.com> - 2019-07-09 07:03 +0000
Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-07-09 03:31 +0200
Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Ketch <nobody@home.com> - 2019-07-09 07:03 +0000
Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-07-09 11:13 -0500
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 14:12 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-07-08 09:05 -0500
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:33 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-08 11:05 -0700
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:17 -0600
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2019-07-17 23:25 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-18 01:21 +0100
Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-18 15:47 -0600
csiph-web