Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #71976

Re: Debian 10 "buster" released

From "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com>
Newsgroups alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Debian 10 "buster" released
Date 2019-07-07 20:31 -0500
Organization Neodome
Message-ID <qfu6cs$q06$1@neodome.net> (permalink)
References <gof1o0Fh1ddU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

> 
> On 07/07/2019 20.43, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
> 
> 
>> Systemd was designed to take care of the deficiencies in init.
> 
> It's not an init system anymore, it does far more and those breaks 
the Unix philosophy of doing just one thing and then do it really 
well.
> 
> A big issue with systemd as it incorporates so many things, it's 
the init system which most frequently has major security issues.
> 
> 
> 
>> Init just started processes but never managed those processes.
> 
> Other init systems have had management features as restart of 
service when it's died, but this causes a problem, there is a reason 
why it dies, the reason why it dies should be investigated and 
fixed, not just automatically restart it, as it will die soon again.

  I am mainly a Windows user.  There is no auto restart in Windows.  
I have a simple program I wrote that keeps track of critical 
programs and notifies me if they should terminate.  I would never 
consider allowing Windows to take care of just restarting processes 
again for me.  I do not see auto restart as a viable argument for 
having systemd.  I believe that systemd was developed so that Red 
Hat could take control of the Linux platform.  You can argue that 
there are other platforms, but when Red Hat makes new developments, 
they will most likely be tied to systemd, thereby pushing out other 
platforms.  I believe that systemd is a continuous disaster in the 
making.

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-07 07:02 -0500
  Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-07 07:27 -0700
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-07-07 09:36 -0500
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-07 07:50 -0700
  Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 12:43 -0600
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-07 19:53 +0100
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:45 -0600
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:50 +0100
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-07-08 12:53 +0000
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-07-08 16:17 -0400
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2019-07-08 09:48 -0400
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:19 -0600
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 19:17 +0100
              Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:06 -0600
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-07-08 17:47 +0000
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-07-07 22:07 +0200
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-07 21:21 +0100
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:50 -0600
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:54 +0100
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:21 -0600
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-07 23:53 +0200
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:51 -0600
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-08 01:56 +0200
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:22 -0600
              Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-08 20:58 +0200
                Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:08 -0600
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:48 -0600
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:52 +0100
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:27 -0600
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 19:19 +0100
              Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:11 -0600
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-07 20:31 -0500
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:29 -0600
          Debian 10 "buster" released Jeff-Relf.Me  @.@ - 2019-07-08 11:29 -0700
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-08 15:17 -0500
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:12 -0600
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2019-07-09 00:24 +0200
              "Antimalware Service Executable" Jeff-Relf.Me  @.@ - 2019-07-08 16:00 -0700
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" "Snowden" <Edmail@fromrussiawithlove.net> - 2019-07-08 18:10 -0500
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Ketch <nobody@home.com> - 2019-07-09 07:03 +0000
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-07-09 03:31 +0200
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Ketch <nobody@home.com> - 2019-07-09 07:03 +0000
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-07-09 11:13 -0500
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 14:12 +0100
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-07-08 09:05 -0500
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:33 -0600
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-08 11:05 -0700
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:17 -0600
  Re: Debian 10 "buster" released William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2019-07-17 23:25 +0100
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-18 01:21 +0100
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-18 15:47 -0600

csiph-web