Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #8480
| From | Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy |
| Date | 2016-02-05 03:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYDQJ-1M6-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qSy7o-3RB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTW7E-4rx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYvzQ-4U8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Wouter and thanks for the reply. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> wrote: > It is fair to say that Debian supports: > - Non-technical desktop users who want to use one of: > - Gnome > - KDE > - Mate > - Cinnamon > - XFCE > - LXDE > - non-technical users who want to run a web, print, or SSH server; > - Technical users who want to use anything else > > since these are the "tasks" that are included in the installer, and > which produce a full selection of packages. > > FluxBox is not one of those. If you want to use a user interface that > isn't one of the standard environments, it's certainly possible to do so > within Debian, but it *will* indeed require a lot more effort. > > However, going from there to saying that "Debian is only for the tech > savvy sys admin type and the server market" is taking a bit of a leap > that I'm not sure is a fair one. We do support less tech savvy people, > just not with such highly customized environments. Very true, I agree with all of your points. Going back to my original purpose of posting this question, I wanted to do a sort of "sales pitch" to encourage Debian to offer Fluxbox as a task in the installer. I actually wrote up a spec which you can find here: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktop/FluxboxSpec I had just watched a video about Debian development and the speaker said the official motto might be the universal operating system, but the unofficial motto is the sys admin distro for sys admins. So, I thought this might be a good angle for my pitch...hey, Debian is for the technically savvy, so why not offer a technically savvy windows manager in addition to the others. As for the others (Gnome, KDE, etc), I might add that they are mostly just aping the Windows paradigm, but that might be my chauvinist Fluxbox attitude :-) As for what I think, having used Debian for many years, I think Debian is for the server market and also a major "feeder" for all the downstream distros. I think that's where Debian derives power and fills its niche very well. Thanks again for the reply. Also...let's get Fluxbox in the installer's tasks list! All those server admins deserve an easy install :-) Steve
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 05:10 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2016-01-16 07:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 00:30 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr> - 2016-01-16 13:00 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr> - 2016-01-17 00:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 00:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2016-01-16 15:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-01-16 19:00 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 00:20 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 07:20 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Daniel Sousa <daniel@sousa.me> - 2016-01-19 07:40 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 03:30 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@fluxbox.org> - 2016-01-23 03:50 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 04:10 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2016-02-04 18:10 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:00 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2016-02-05 10:50 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:40 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> - 2016-02-05 17:20 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2016-02-05 18:50 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:30 +0100
csiph-web