Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1318348
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk, allow different timestamps for printk.time |
| Date | 2016-01-26 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qViz8-10v-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qUR5T-5RR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Prarit,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 87d40a7..2cf6692 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3060,8 +3060,9 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> Format: <bool> (1/Y/y=enable, 0/N/n=disable)
> default: disabled
>
> - printk.time= Show timing data prefixed to each printk message line
> - Format: <bool> (1/Y/y=enable, 0/N/n=disable)
> + printk.time= Show timestamp prefixed to each printk message line
> + Format: [0-2] (0 = disable,
> + 1 = monotonic clock, 2 = real clock)
Doesn't this break systems, which have 'Y/y' on the command line?
> static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
> static struct timekeeper shadow_timekeeper;
> +static int timekeeping_active;
>
> /**
> * struct tk_fast - NMI safe timekeeper
> @@ -401,6 +402,16 @@ u64 ktime_get_raw_fast_ns(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_get_raw_fast_ns);
>
> +u64 ktime_get_log_ts(u64 *offset_real)
> +{
> + *offset_real = ktime_to_ns(tk_core.timekeeper.offs_real);
> +
> + if (timekeeping_active)
> + return ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
> + else
> + return local_clock();
Just for the record: The fast timekeeper stops across the inner workings of
suspend/resume. But I think that doesn't matter much.
Otherwise, this looks good now.
Thanks,
tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] printk, allow different timestamps for printk.time Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-01-25 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk, allow different timestamps for printk.time Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-01-26 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk, allow different timestamps for printk.time Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> - 2016-01-26 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] printk, allow different timestamps for printk.time Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-01-27 10:50 +0100
csiph-web