Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation

From	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation
Date	2016-01-19 00:30 +0100
Message-ID	<qSrpg-7KW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <qz1F0-3Jz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAWUx-49J-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qB1rc-76P-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNCbF-4Sl-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSqtc-73V-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 23:22 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> 
> > > I (still) haven't had a chance to have a good look at it, but I won't this week
> > > anyway. So post v5 and hopefully I can review that and it will be perfect :)
> > 
> > The perfect v5 is there now, for 4 weeks minus the holiday season, and 
> > no further problems arose. Independently verified by Petr Mladek -- 
> > don't forget his high-level fix.
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> so what are the current plans with this one, please? Is this going through 
> ppc tree, ftrace tree, or does it have issues that need to be worked on 
> before merging?

Anton and I need to review it and then it will be merged via the powerpc tree.
We just haven't had the spare cycles to do it.

cheers

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-01-18 23:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-01-19 00:30 +0100

csiph-web