Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #8439
| From | Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy |
| Date | 2016-01-16 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qRDiO-7Cw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qRqlA-7CU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRAbg-5wQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 17/01/2016 1:29 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > On 1/15/16 10:48 PM, Stephan Foley wrote: >> Hello, I'm trying to characterize Debian and have the following: >> >> Debian is for the tech savvy sys admin type and the server >> market >> >> Is this a good characterization or am I off base? >> >> Thanks > > Used to be. These days, in the wake of systemd, at least this sys > admin will never install it again. The reasons are technical. Yes, it is certainly limiting my view of Debian to be one that is now broken and definitely not what Ian Murdock envisioned many years ago. : ( A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAlaahJAACgkQqBZry7fv4vvLSAD/XagyhyE3hZYw4MC+3SC/Oh0x mPgfbB56Hci2yjRxGWUA/RiHrnFSLSO/7qyCmJm1vWRuiEvo9Q5JzHCiQA7Os2li =EFBM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 05:10 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2016-01-16 07:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 00:30 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr> - 2016-01-16 13:00 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr> - 2016-01-17 00:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 00:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> - 2016-01-16 15:40 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-01-16 19:00 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 00:20 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2016-01-18 18:50 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 07:20 +0100
Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Daniel Sousa <daniel@sousa.me> - 2016-01-19 07:40 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 03:30 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@fluxbox.org> - 2016-01-23 03:50 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 04:10 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2016-02-04 18:10 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:00 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2016-02-05 10:50 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:40 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> - 2016-02-05 17:20 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2016-02-05 18:50 +0100
Re: Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy Stephan Foley <foley12723@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:30 +0100
csiph-web