Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #163065

Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/14/2016 10:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2016 16:18:08 Johann Klammer wrote:
> 
>> Synaptic runs on your box?
>> Years ago, when I tried it, it would always crash right on startup....
>> use aptitude. It seems a lot more stable...
> 
> Back on list where it belongs.
> 
> I just ran it, and its obvious it doesn't reference the same database of 
> installed files that apt and synaptic use.  It just now wanted 
AFAIK, It does use the same database. Your system seems hosed...
Are you running it on the box that the OS is installed on, or on some 
(boot... ,whatever) client?

> to "upgrade" or sidegrade, 292 packages.  Refreshing the list didn't 
> help but it reminded me of the 4 color screens we had on the amiga's 
> back in the amigados-1.3 days.  Positively an assault on the eyeballs.

press u to update.

> 
> But when an uptodate system is said to have 292 old or defective packages 
> on it, I'm not sure I want it mucking around in MY used car lot.
what kind of defective? broken? that means the dependencies are not met...
Press e to start the interactive resolver. 
a and r to accept or reject.

> 
> For what its worth, as root, an apt-get update, followed by an apt-get 
> upgrade reports 0 package to upgrade.
> 
> From that it would appear aptitude is confused at best, broken at worst.
> 
> All of these tools are, AFAIK, supposed to be using the same 
> sources.list, and the same installed list. update-manager does but 
> Obviously aptitude is not.
> 
> I believe I'll stick to using synaptic.
> 
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> 

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Johann Klammer <klammerj@a1.net> - 2016-01-15 00:00 +0100
  Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-15 00:50 +0100
    Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 01:30 +0100
      Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from  apt_check.py Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2016-01-15 03:30 +0100
        Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-15 03:40 +0100
          Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py dean <deanshannon3@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 04:20 +0100
            Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-01-15 04:40 +0100
          Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 04:30 +0100
          Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from  apt_check.py Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2016-01-15 05:00 +0100
            Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-01-15 05:50 +0100
              Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from  apt_check.py Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2016-01-15 14:30 +0100
                Re: wheezy, message log being spammed by segfaults from apt_check.py Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 16:00 +0100

csiph-web